Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Manifest Representatives of the PHSIEHD and the Stockton Fire Department were present <br /> during the tank removal As observed during tank removal, the diesel tank was <br /> manufactured of steel and there were no signs of corrosion or leakage from the tank <br /> ' After the tank was removed, the excavation was visually inspected and soil samples were <br /> collected by a Kennedy/Jenks representative The excavation was approximately 16 feet <br /> ' wide by 12 feet long by approximately 10 feet deep No staining was observed in the tank <br /> excavation Soil samples collected from the excavation sidewalls and bottom and from <br /> excavated soils were analyzed in the field with an organic vapor analyzer Organic vapors <br /> were not detected in these samples <br /> ' Two soil samples (T-1 , T-2) were collected from native soil at both ends of the excavation at <br /> depths approximately 1 to 2 feet below the tank excavation bottom The samples were <br /> collected by hand-driving brass liners into soil located in the backhoe bucket The <br /> approximate location of the tank excavation and the soil sample locations are shown on <br /> Figure 4 A composite soil sample (T-3) was also collected from the stockpiled soil removed <br /> from the tank excavation This sample was placed on-hold in the laboratory and was to be <br /> analyzed only if chemicals of concern were detected in samples T-1 and T-2 <br /> ' <br /> Laboratory Analyses Results Soil samples T-1 and T-2 were analyzed on a 48-hour turn- <br /> around-time basis for the following constituents <br /> • Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel (TPH-D) by EPA Method 8015 <br /> • Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Method 8020 <br /> ' Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons and BTEX were not detected above method detection limits in <br /> samples T-1 and T-2 The results of laboratory analyses were discussed with Ms Kasey <br /> Folley of the PHSIEHD on 4 May 1990 Ms Folley agreed that the laboratory results indicate <br /> that the tank had not leaked and that the tank excavation could be backfilled <br /> The tank excavation was backfilled on 10 and 11 May 1990 The bottom excavation was <br /> backfilled with pea gravel to approximately 4 5 feet below ground surface Prior to <br /> ' backfilling, the excavation was lined with a filter fabric to prevent crossing of native soils <br /> The top of the pea gravel was also covered with the fabric before backfilling with soil The <br /> stockpiled soil removed from the tank excavation was placed in a low spot in the sales yard <br /> ' A complete description of the tank removal was provided in our June 1991 Phase II <br /> Investigation and Site Closure Report, Cal-Farm Supply Stockton Facility This report was <br /> ' submitted to the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and included <br /> recommendations for no further work and for closure of the five Site monitoring wells <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Program <br /> In October 1992, Ms Whitworth was notified by the RWQCB that additional investigation of <br /> ' the tank site would be required In April 1993, she was officially notified, in an undated <br /> I <br /> 112254000 3 922540 00 <br /> 04/26/94 2 28pm <br />