Laserfiche WebLink
EPP <br /> t <br /> Coca-Cola Enterprises - West <br /> Job No. 90054 <br /> 3.5 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS <br /> Groundwater monitoring was performed in all groundwater monitoring wells on September <br /> 17, 1990. The free product was checked and the depth to water was measured in each well <br /> to the nearest 0.1-inch using a calibrated electronic interface probe (Photograph No. 5). Prior <br /> to monitoring each well, the interface probe was decontaminated using an Alconoxm detergent <br /> wash followed by a distilled water rinse,an isopropyl alcohol rinse,and a final rinse of distilled <br /> water. The depth to groundwater measurements and the water table elevation data are <br /> presented in Table 2. <br /> Groundwater elevation data is based on a well head s,irvey conducted by Mid-Valley <br /> Engineering, Inc., Modesto, California. The well elevat;ons were established from level circuits <br /> carried from the City of Stockton Benchmark No. 77. The accuracy of this survey was plus or <br /> minus 0.02 feet. The groundwater elevation results are discussed in Section 6.5. <br /> 3.7 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING <br /> - Groundwater samples were collected from groundwater monitoring wells MW-1 through MW- <br /> 3 in August, 1990,and from wells MW-4 and MW-5 in September, 1990. In order to minimize <br /> the potential for cross-contamination during the sampling process,work proceeded in order from <br /> the wells with the least reported or suspected contamination to wells with increasingly <br /> contaminated water. All items used within the well (including the bailer and electronic interface <br /> probe) were decontaminated between each sample in accordance with the procedures outline in <br /> f.a <br /> Section 3.10. <br /> ' 3 3.8 SOIL VAPOR A40NITORING <br /> Soil vapors were monitored in each boring with an HNU model PI 101 photoionization detector <br /> f ' (PID) equipped with a 10.2 electron volt(eV) lamp. For each sample interval,the lower sample <br /> retainer was promptly removed from the drive sampler barrel and transferred to a labeled <br /> F , "ziplock" style plastic bag (Photograph No. 4). The sample was then disaggregated and <br /> allowed to stabilize under ambient conditions for a minimum of fifteen minutes. The HNU <br /> probe was then inserted through the seal of the plastic bag into the "headspace" above the soil <br /> } sample. The highest HNU readings were.then recorded in parts per million (ppm) on the <br /> a.:J . <br />