Laserfiche WebLink
First Quarter 1993 Monitoring Report <br /> Coca-Cola Enterpnses- West <br /> Project No 54006 02 <br /> Page 2 <br /> 1990, an additional subsurface investigation in October and November 1990; and quarterly <br /> groundwater monitoring The results of these investigations are presented in the reports listed <br /> at the end of this report A soil vapor extraction test was conducted at the site by RESNA in <br />' November 1992 (RESNA, January 1993) Investigations have shown that the majority of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil were present from 0 to approximately 25 feet below grade <br /> and within a radius of about 20 feet of the former 1,000 gallon gasoline UST tank pit. Quarterly <br />' groundwater monitoring results have shown detectable levels of petroleum hydrocarbons in the <br /> monitoring wells (Table 1). <br /> GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND GRADIENT EVALUATION <br />' RESNA personnel performed the latest quarterly groundwater monitoring of monitoring wells <br /> on March 11, 1993 Mr Michael Collins of SJCPHS was present on-site to observe RESNA <br />' sampling techniques Field work consisted of measuring depth-to-water (DTV) levels in wells <br /> MW-1 through MW-6, collecting groundwater samples from wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-6, <br /> and submitting groundwater samples for laboratory analysis <br /> Water level measurements were collected from wells MW-1 through MW-6 The depth to water <br /> ranged from 71.13 to 71.76 below top of well casing elevation. In general, groundwater <br />' elevations have increased an average of 2.78 feet since December 17, 1992. The water level <br /> data were used to develop the groundwater elevation contour map (Plate 3) Assuming that <br /> horizontal isotropic conditions prevail, groundwater in the uppermost aquifer beneath the site <br />' flowed in an easterly direction The hydraulic gradient on March 11, 1993 was calculated to <br /> be 0.001 ft/ft or about 7 feet/mile These data indicate a slight seasonal change when compared <br /> with previous results for gradient and flow direction A summary of groundwater monitoring <br />' data is presented in Table 2. Groundwater elevations are referenced to feet mean sea level. <br /> Groundwater samples were collected from three shallow groundwater monitoring wells, MW-1, <br />' MW-2, and MW-6 Prior to collection of groundwater samples a minimum of three well <br /> volumes (casing and sandpack)was purged The depth-to-water,pH, electrical conductivity, and <br /> temperature were measured and allowed to stabilize before groundwater samples were collected <br /> tNo evidence of measurable floating product or hydrocarbon vapor was noted in the water <br /> samples Samples were then collected from each well using disposable bailers. Purge water was <br /> contained in 55 gallon DOT approved drums and stored on-site <br />' Theroundwater samples collected from <br /> g p each well were submitted with Chain of Custody <br /> Record to RESNA Analytical Laboratories of Fremont, California, a State Certified laboratory <br /> (State Hazardous Waste Testing Laboratory Certification No 1211). Samples were analyzed <br /> for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHG), total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel <br />' 1QMRt993 FNi. <br /> 1 <br />