My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007882
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
1100
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0507217
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007882
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2020 10:11:40 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 3:02:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0007882
RECORD_ID
PR0507217
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007741
FACILITY_NAME
AUTO ZONE INC
STREET_NUMBER
1100
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
11733035
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1100 N WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Working To Restore Nature <br />' Report on Vapor Extraction Test January 29, 1993 <br /> Coca-Cola Former Distribution Facility, Stockton, California 5400601 <br />' for the remaining observation wells, the screened interval overlap was at least 20 feet, which <br /> is more than adequate for good vacuum impact The induced vacuums measured in the <br />' observation wells are considered to be low The correlation between distance from <br /> extraction well VEW-1 and vacuum impact in observation wells was good, but distance alone <br /> is insufficient to account for the low induced vacuum readings As discussed below in "Field <br /> Vapor Monitoring", an increase in subsurface oxygen content was a function of increased <br /> flow rate in all wells, except VEW-1 VEW-1 had the highest flow rate, as reported in <br /> Table 3, but a low oxygen content The reason for this is unknown, but may be due to <br /> differential flow through a subsurface anaerobic sandy channel or may be due to anaerobic <br /> organic material such as peat, which allows high air flows but depletes subsurface oxygen <br />' Field Vapor Monitoring <br /> Vapor concentrations, oxygen concentrations, and lower explosivity limits (LEL) were <br /> monitored during testing and sampling at each well with a Bacharach 503A explosimeter <br /> Subsurface oxygen concentrations ranged from 2% to 4% in extraction well VEW-3, from <br /> 5% to 10% in extraction well VEW-1, and in the observation wells oxygen ranged from 4% <br /> in VEW-4 to 14% in VEW-8 Ambient air generally contains about 21% oxygen Wellhead <br /> oxygen concentrations are reported in Table 3 For all wells, except VEW-1, an increase <br /> in air flow was accompanied by a corresponding increase in soil vapor oxygen concentration <br /> ' The correlation was linear when % oxygen was graphed as a function of air flow rate <br /> The explosive range for gasoline is 1 417o to 8% (14,000 parts per million by volume [ppmv] <br /> ' to 80,000 ppmv), with 14,000 representing the lower explosive limit (LEL) and 80,000 the <br /> upper limit (UEL) (where 14,000 ppmv represents about 63,000 mg/m3 and 80,000 ppmv <br /> represents about 360,000 mg/m3) Outside this range the gasoline/air mixture is either too <br /> lean or too rich for explosive conditions to develop Field vapor concentrations are reported <br /> in Table 2, and are considered order of magnitude only and are subject to the results of <br /> laboratory analysis Field recorded vapor concentrations ranged from 1,500 ppmv to greater <br /> ' than 10,000 ppmv, with the higher concentrations being recorded in VEW-3 The highest <br /> measurement on the LEL meter was 35% of the LEL which is below the explosive range <br /> iDISCUSSION <br /> Effective Radius of Influence <br /> Utilizing induced vacuum and distance measurements obtained during the VET, an effective <br /> radius of influence was estimated for the vapor wells at the site The effective radius of <br /> influence has been defined as the radial distance from a vapor extraction well at which <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.