My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEBER
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0515450
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2020 6:26:41 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 3:50:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0515450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0012153
FACILITY_NAME
SOUTH SHORE PARCEL
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
WEBER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
WEBER AVE
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
California Reponal Water Quality Atrol Board <br /> Central Valley Region <br /> Robert Schneider,Chair <br /> Terry Tamminen Arnold Schwarzenegger <br /> Secretary for Sacramento Main Office Governor <br /> Environmental Internet Address: http://w".swrcb.m.gov/mgcb5 <br /> Protection 11020 Sun Center Drive#200 Rancho Cordova,CA 95670.6114 <br /> Phone(916)464-3291 <br /> Fax(916)464-4797 <br /> ATTACHMENT C.3 <br /> ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED IN A <br /> FEASIBILITY STUDY/REMEDIAL OPTIONS EVALUATION REPORT <br /> The outline below is a minimum requirement for items to be included and discussed in the text of all <br /> feasibility studies/remedial option evaluation reports submitted to the Board. Reports must be signed by <br /> a registered geologist, certified engineering geologist, or civil engineer registered or certified by the <br /> state of California. <br /> I. Purpose of Feasibility Study/Remedial Options Evaluation <br /> II. Background <br /> A. Description of Facility <br /> B. Site History <br /> 1. Years of Operation <br /> 2. Chemical Use <br /> 3. Chemical Releases (Potential and Documented) <br /> C. Geology <br /> 1. Regional <br /> 2. Local, soil type, lithology, lateral extent of lithologic units <br /> D. Hydrogeology <br /> 1. Aquifers, Aquitards,Perched Aquifers <br /> 2. Groundwater flow rates, directions, recharge, discharge <br /> 3. Groundwater Use <br /> 4. Extraction and injection wells affect on groundwater flow <br /> E. Surface Water <br /> 1. Losing or gaining streams,ponds etc. <br /> 2. Hydraulic connection with aquifers <br /> F. Local Land Use <br /> G. Previous Investigation and Remedial Actions <br /> II. Nature and Extent of Contamination <br /> A. Contaminants in Soils <br /> 1. Types and Concentrations <br /> 2. Lateral and Vertical Extent <br /> B. Pollutants in Groundwater <br /> 1. Types and Concentrations <br /> 2. Lateral and Vertical Extent(including Perched Zones) <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> (a Recycled Paper <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.