My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011735
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEBER
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0515450
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011735
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2020 11:30:50 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 3:55:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011735
RECORD_ID
PR0515450
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0012153
FACILITY_NAME
SOUTH SHORE PARCEL
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
WEBER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
WEBER AVE
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
501
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Phase ii Environmental Site Assessment <br /> Multi-Modal Station <br /> Stockton,San Joaquin County,California <br /> Page 3 <br /> bearing units of the local natural gas fields The Cretaceous deposits are underlain by basement rock <br /> belonging to the Franciscan Assemblage or the Sierra Nevada Granitics and Metamorphics <br /> Previous work performed by Condor in the vicinity of the site and subsequently confirmed by drilling at <br /> the site indicates that the soils of downtown Stockton are predominantly clays, sandy clays, and silty <br /> clays, especially near the surface <br /> Groundwater monitoring activities at nearby properties indicate the general groundwater gradient in the <br /> vicinity of the site is to the east, with the gradient at individual sites ranging from the northeast to the <br /> southeast The site may receive groundwater flow from properties to the northwest, west, and southwest <br /> Addresses that appeared during the government database search are tabulated in the Phase I ESA report <br /> with their approximate distance from the site and their gradient position with respect to the site The site <br /> does not appear to receive significant runoff from other properties Drainage from the site and adjacent <br /> properties appears to flow to the adjacent streets where it is conveyed to the city storm drainage system <br /> 4.0 FIELD PROCEDURES <br /> 4.1 SITE PREPARATION <br /> On April 17, 2002, Condor submitted an application for encroachment on public right-of-way to the City <br /> of Stockton Public Works Department for the borings to be advanced within the roadway of the site On <br /> April 18, 2002, Condor submitted eight well permit application forms to the San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department (EHD) One well permit application form was submitted for each of <br /> the six blocks and two well permit application forms were submitted for the borings to be advanced <br /> within the roadways--one for cone penetration test(CPT) drilling and the other for Geoprobe drilling On <br /> May 10, 2002, Condor mailed letters to the owners of the properties located within the six-block area <br /> notifying them of the upcoming work intended to be conducted at the site <br /> All CPT and direct push boring location areas were marked with white paint, and Underground Services <br /> Alert (USA) was notified at least 72 hours in advance of the drilling fieldwork to locate and identify <br /> underground utilities in the vicinity of the work area However, because many of the proposed boring <br /> locations were on private property, some utilities contacted by USA did not mark the locations of their <br /> utilities past property boundaries and onto private properties EHD and the City of Stockton were notified <br /> of the fieldwork schedule at least 48 hours in advance Prior to commencement of fieldwork each day, a <br /> tailgate safety meeting was conducted and a site-specific Health and Safety Plan was discussed with, and <br /> presented to, all field personnel for their signatures <br /> 4 2 INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURES <br /> 4.2.1 Investigative Rationale <br /> The Phase 11 ESA was designed to evaluate potentially large and medium-sized soil and groundwater <br /> contamination in areas of concern,both on and off site, previously identified in the Phase I ESA by RECs <br /> and HRECs The Phase II ESA was conducted in order of the following investigative methods <br /> A CPT investigation involved the installation of CPT borings around the site in the public right- <br /> of-way to obtain information regarding the soil types present beneath the site, especially aquifers <br /> (soil types that allow groundwater to flow) and aquitards (soil types that limit the ability of <br /> groundwater to flow) This was done to determine at what depths groundwater might be expected <br /> beneath the site <br /> ➢ A limited ground penetrating radar (GPR) investigation was designed to obtain additional <br /> . information pertaining to the subsurface conditions at the proposed boring locations on selected <br /> �c CONDOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.