|
CPT Interpretations
<br /> Table 2 References
<br /> No Reference
<br /> 1 Robertson, P K and Campanella,R G, 1986,"Guidelines for Use Interpretation and Application of
<br /> the CPT and CPTU",UBC,Soil Mechanics Series No 105 Civil Eng Dept Vancouver,
<br /> B C Canada
<br /> 2 Robertson P K Campanella R G,Gillespie D and Greig,J, 1986,"Use of Piezometer Cone
<br /> Data', Proceedings of InSitu 86,ASCE Specialty Conference,Blacksburg,Virginia
<br /> 3I Robertson, P K and Campanella R G 1989 "Guidelines for Geotechnical Design Using CPT and
<br /> CPTU", UBC,Soil Mechanics Series No 120,Civil Eng Dept,Vancouver,8 C,Canada
<br /> 4 Robertson,P K, 1990,"Soil Classification Using the Cone Penetration Test",Canadian Geotechnical
<br /> Journal,Volume 27
<br /> 5 Robertson, P K and Fear,C E, 1995, "Liquefaction of Sands and its Evaluation',Keynote Lecture,
<br /> First International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering,Tokyo,Japan
<br /> 6 Gregg In Situ Internal Report
<br /> 7 Robertson,P K and Wride,C E, 1997,"Cyclic Liquefaction and its Evaluation Based on SPT and
<br /> CPT",NCEER Workshop Paper,January 22, 1997
<br /> 8 I Wride, C E and Robertson,P K, 1997,"Phase 11 Data Review Report(Massey and Kidd Sites,
<br /> Fraser River Delta)", Volume 1 -Data Report(June 1997), University of Alberta
<br /> 9 Plewes,H D, Davies,M P and Jeffenes, M G 1992 `CPT Based Screening Procedure for
<br /> Evaluating Liquefaction Susceptibility",45th Canadian Geotechnical Conference,Toronto,
<br /> Ontario, October 1992
<br /> EGG
<br />
|