Laserfiche WebLink
Appendix C Ground Penetrating Radar Investigation <br /> Phase 11 ESA Multi-Modal Station"Six-Block Pruiect" <br /> January 6,2603 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> • Attenuation of electromagnetic waves transmitted through a medium is directly related to the electrical <br /> conductivity of the medium A highly electrically-conductive medium will attenuate electromagnetic <br /> waves rapidly, and the extent to which the electromagnetic waves penetrate the medium will be reduced <br /> Many of the minerals that comprise a typical clay soil (so-called "clay minerals") are highly conductive <br /> due to their strong ionic character In addition, clay minerals are hydrated minerals, and conductivity <br /> increases further with increasing salt content of the incorporated water Wet clays are even more difficult <br /> to penetrate with electromagnetic waves, as the additional water with its salt content only enhances the <br /> attenuation effects In the worst conditions, the depth of investigation of GPR may be limited to as little <br /> as one foot below ground surface (bgs) Previous work performed by Condor in the vicinity of the site and <br /> subsequently confirmed by drilling at the site indicates that the soils of downtown Stockton are <br /> predominantly clays, sandy clays, and silty clays, especially near the surface The presence of these soil <br /> types at the site limited the effective depth of this GPR investigation to an estimated six to eight feet bgs <br /> 1.2 INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY AND INSTRUMENTATION <br /> The GPR investigation of selected areas of the site was performed to meet two objectives The primary <br /> objective of the investigation was to garner additional information pertaining to subsurface conditions at <br /> the proposed boring locations on selected private properties within the site The secondary objective was <br /> to investigate certain properties or portions thereof for evidence of suspect environmental conditions, such <br /> as the potential presence of USTs and other buried objects <br /> Prior to commencement of drilling activities on private properties, Condor representatives inspected <br /> individual properties to attempt to identify boring locations that were easily accessible, generally <br /> consistent with the proposed boring locations for the site, and strategically positioned with respect to <br /> . features typically associated with potential subsurface contamination To accomplish this last task, each <br /> property selected for drilling was visually inspected for features such as drains, paint rooms, asphalt and <br /> concrete damage and patches, hazardous materials containers and storage areas, indicators of potential <br /> USTs, etc Boring locations were selected to provide a higher likelihood of finding potential <br /> contamination <br /> After the boring locations for a property were selected, each boring location was investigated by <br /> collecting a series of GPR data The GPR data for most boring locations were collected by traversing six <br /> intersecting lines, three from west to east and three from south to north The lines were spaced <br /> approximately 15 feet apart and were approximately three to four feet in length, forming a three-foot by <br /> three-foot grid centered on each boring location Slight variations to this scheme were necessary for some <br /> boring locations based on site conditions The purpose of this methodology was to investigate each <br /> preliminarily identified boring location for underground piping, conduits, or other burred objects that <br /> would necessitate relocation of the boring After reviewing the collected data, the actual boring locations <br /> were marked in the portions of the grids with the least likelihood of being above a buried object If no <br /> portions of the grid appeared to be clear for drilling, entirely new locations were selected and additional <br /> data was collected and evaluated <br /> Whenever borings are advanced, drilling into an active utility line is a potentially expensive, time- <br /> consuming, and dangerous possibility, especially in older, developed urban areas To alleviate these <br /> concerns, the GPR investigation was conducted to supplement other safety precautions, including the <br /> notification of USA at least 72 hours before commencement of drilling and the advancement of the first <br /> five feet of each boring by hand augering The GPR investigation provided additional assurance of the <br /> feasibility of drilling at a particular location for two reasons notification of USA does not generally result <br /> 40 <br /> in identification of utility locations on private properties, and some utilities may be burred at depths <br />