Laserfiche WebLink
Phase li Environmental Site Assessment <br /> Mulu-Modal Station <br /> Stockton,San Joaquin County,California <br /> Page 6 <br /> • 4.2.4 2 Soil Sampling Procedures and Laboratory Analyses <br /> Continuous core soil samples were collected from 5 to 15 feet bgs for laboratory analyses from the <br /> Geoprobe and detection bonngs The soil samples were collected in clean acetate sleeves installed in five- <br /> foot long macro core samplers Three soil samples, each approximately four inches long, were cut from <br /> the acetate liners at depths of approximately 5, 10, and 15 feet bgs The ends of the acetate liners were <br /> covered with Teflon® sheeting and capped with plastic end caps The samples were labeled for <br /> identification and placed in a cooler chilled with ice The remainder of the acetate liner was opened for <br /> lithologic logging and other observations A grab sample of soil from each recovered acetate liner was <br /> placed in a re-sealable plastic bag for headspace screening of volatile organic vapors with a PID <br /> If soil contamination was observed in field samples below 15 feet bgs, additional soil samples were <br /> collected at approximately five-foot intervals through the apparent extent of impacted soil and retained for <br /> analyses The soil sampling equipment was cleaned prior to collecting each sample by washing in a <br /> solution of laboratory-grade, non-phosphate detergent and deionized water, and double-rinsing with <br /> deionized water <br /> Upon completion of the daily fieldwork, the soil samples were delivered by courier, under chain-of- <br /> custody procedures, to Excelchem Environmental Labs, Inc , in Roseville, California The three soil <br /> samples collected from each boring at 5, 10, and 15 feet bgs were typically composited in a three-to-one <br /> ratio by the laboratory and analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by Environmental Protection <br /> Agency(EPA) Method 8260B If soil contamination was identified by field observation or PID screening, <br /> the three soil samples collected between five and 15 feet bgs, as well as any additional soil samples <br /> collected from depths greater than 15 feet bgs, were analyzed discretely for VOCs by EPA Method <br /> 8260B Analyses including those for semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270C, <br /> • petroleum hydrocarbon constituents by EPA Method 8015m, and the 17 California Administrative <br /> Manual (CAM) metals by EPA Methods 6010B and 7471A were held pending the results of the VOC <br /> analysis <br /> 4.2.4.3 Groundwater Sampling Procedures and Laboratory Analyses <br /> Groundwater samples were collected from the detection and hydropunch borings In an attempt to obtain <br /> representative depth to water data, and minimize sample turbidity, a temporary well screen was installed <br /> in the detection borings, and these borings were allowed to stand open until the end of the day in which <br /> they were installed The depth to water measurements and groundwater samples were collected from the <br /> borings in the same order that they were installed Prior to sample collection, the water level in each <br /> detection boring was measured to the nearest 0 01 foot with a battery-operated water-level meter The <br /> depth to water was referenced to the ground surface adjacent to the boring The water-level meter was <br /> cleaned prior to measuring the depth to water in each boring by washing it in a solution of laboratory- <br /> grade,non-phosphate detergent and deionized water, and double-nnsing with deionized water <br /> The detection and hydropunch borings were sampled using polyethylene tubing fitted with a stainless <br /> steel check valve The sample containers were slowly filled directly from the sample tubing in order to <br /> minimize sample agitation Each water sample was collected in a minimum of three 40-milliliter (mL) <br /> volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials, two one-liter amber glass containers, and one 250-mL plastic <br /> container Each sample container was labeled for sample identification and placed in a cooler chilled with <br /> ice Following the collection of the groundwater samples, the detection and hydropunch borings were <br /> backfilled with neat cement grout at the end of each day <br /> . Upon completion of the daily fieldwork, the groundwater samples were delivered by courser, under chain- <br /> of-custody procedures, to Excelchem Environmental Labs,Inc , in Roseville, California The groundwater <br /> 1 1 <br /> 4 <br /> �t� CONDOR <br />