COMPLIANCE INFO_2000-2011 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

determination for waste liquid found in a 55 -gallon drum had not been made, and an empty, contaminated 55 -gallon drum was not marked with the date it was emptied (Attachment 4). On October 31, 2006, notification was received for an UST monitoring system certification, which was scheduled for November 9, 2006. On November 9, 2006, Mr. von Flue witnessed the UST monitoring system certification (Attachment 5), which was billed at EHD's hourly rate. All sensors, leak detectors, and spill containers passed, and Mr. von FlUe did not find any additional violations during the inspection (Attachment 6). Mr. von Flue also approved the facility's monitoring and response plans while on site. On December 1, 2006, Mr. von Flue sent a follow-up letter by certified mail to the facility regarding the items required on the UST and hazardous waste inspection reports dated October 30, 2006 (Attachment 7). None of the items noted in the respective inspection reports were ever corrected or submitted. On November 15, 2007, Mr. von Flue performed a routine UST inspection (Attachment 8) and witnessed the annual monitoring system certification, leak detector testing, and spill container testing. Current financial responsibility documents were not on file with this office, and the certification for their current designated operator, Ms. Lori Freshour, was expired as of September 17, 2007 (Attachment 9). The June and October 2007 monthly designated operator reports were not found on site. Fuel leaks were found underneath two of the dispensers. The 91 -octane leak detector failed to detect a 3.0 gallon per hour leak at 10 psi, and the 91 -octane spill container failed a hydrostatic test. The monitoring system certification test report was submitted late (by fax) to this office on December 21, 2007, and by mail on January 14, 2008. The mailed copy is included as an attachment for clarity (Attachment 10). On November 16, 2007, a permit application, SR0052621, was submitted to replace the 91 -octane leak detector and spill container. This permit was approved by Mr. von Flue on November 19, 2007 (Attachment 11). On November 19, 2007, a designated operator statement was submitted with a new designated operator for this facility (Attachment 12). On November 21, 2007, Mr. von Flue verified corrosion protection on the 91 -octane fill riser (Attachment 13). On November 30, 2007, Mr. von Flue, Ms. Stacy Rivera, San Joaquin County Environmental Health Specialist Trainee (EHST), and Mr. Aris Cacapit, EHST, witnessed testing of the new 91 -octane leak detector and hydrostatic testing of the new 91 -octane spill container. Both tests passed and Ms. Rivera wrote an inspection report that Mr. von Flue signed (Attachment 14). W