COMPLIANCE INFO_2002-2005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

s �r January 4,2003 QQ(�L9 Page 3 1103 LIST INSPECTION The following is BP's response to the three items noted during the October 10, 2002 �I^ underground storage tank (UST) inspection. • Item 3: CCR 2711(b) & (c) Current State Forms A& B. The Inspection Report stated that the facility did not possess current State Form B. A copy of the current State Form B is enclosed as Attachment D. In addition, a copy of the current V" form is being provided to the facility. • Item 13: CCR 2635(b)(1) Spill container. 12 The Inspection Report stated that the spill containers for two of the regular tanks contained debris in the spill container and had disconnected drain valve chains. As noted in the Inspection Report, both of these issues were"corrected on site"during the inspection. Although the items noted by the inspector should not be considered a violation of CCR 2635(b)(1), it is BP's policy to address these maintenance issues promptly. To facilitate maintenance of the equipment, BP has requested the lessee-dealer to conduct daily visual equipment inspections of the spill container. BP has provided the lessee-dealer with a checklist of items to be inspected. • Item 20: CCR 2712(b) Maintenance &monitoring records. The Inspection Report stated that the inspector found one monitoring log for August 2002, and requested BP to inform employees/managers to provide copies of the past six months of logs and/or begin completely filling out the daily monitoring log immediately. The Inspection Report also noted that the facility does not have a printer on the monitoring panel. Per the owner-operator agreement between BP and the lessee-dealer, the lessee-dealer is responsible for implementing the facility Monitoring Response Plan (MRP), which requires the lessee-dealer to record inspection observations on the Daily Visual Underground Storage Tank Monitoring Log. BP has reminded the lessee-dealer of this responsibility. We are not aware of a requirement to have a printer on the monitoring panel at the facility. • Request for SB-989 testing results. In the Inspection Report, you requested a copy of the results for the secondary containment testing conducted on October 2 to 4, 2002 at the facility. BP provided these results to EHD on November 7, 2002. The results indicate that all secondary containment components at this facility passed the secondary containment testing. In response to your request, I am also enclosing a copy of the test results with this letter (Attachment E).