My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1996-2004
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
1210
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231125
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1996-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2024 11:40:15 AM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:43:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1996-2004
RECORD_ID
PR0231125
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003730
FACILITY_NAME
TIWANA GAS & FOOD
STREET_NUMBER
1210
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95210
APN
09403012
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1210 E HAMMER LN
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231125_1210 E HAMMER_1996-2004.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
406
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
08/05/2003 08:31 12093651543 TANKNOLOGY PAGE 10/11 <br /> Mo wing system certification 9 <br /> Site Address; 1210E. HAMMER LANE Date of Testing/Service: 08/04/2003 <br /> @ WEST LANE <br /> Results of Testing/Se:vicilig <br /> Software version Installea05 <br /> camleoe the following cheeltiii3t, <br /> X yes No Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> Q YQs Ne Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ED Yes No Were all sensors visually Inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> Q yea No Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary Containment and positioned so that other equipment will not <br /> interfere with their proper operation? <br /> res Nox N/A If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station,Is all Communications equipment(e.g.modem)operational? <br /> For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down If the piping secondary containment <br /> ® Yes ®No 3 N/A monitoring system detects a leak,falls to operate,or is electrically disconnected?If yes:which sensors initiate positive <br /> shut-down?(check all that apply) x❑ Sump/Trench Sensors; 0 Dispenser containment Sensors, <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? 0 Y.5 No <br /> ® Yea No N/A For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e.:no mechanical <br /> overfill prevention valve is installed),Is time overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill points(s)and operating <br /> properly? If so,at what percent of tank Capacity does the alarm trigger? 90 a <br /> ® res ®No Was any monitoring equipment replaced?if yes,identify specific sensor,probes,or other equipment replaced and list the <br /> manufacturer name and model for all re lacement arts in Section 6,below. <br /> YLc No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems?(check all that apply) Product: <br /> [] Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below, <br /> Yes [:]No Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set-up reports,if applicable. <br /> mrr, M Na is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers'specifioations? <br /> on E below, describe haw and when these deficiances were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comment:s: <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.