My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2007-2018
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOUISE
>
2551
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231659
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2007-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2023 1:47:03 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:50:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2007-2018
RECORD_ID
PR0231659
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003849
FACILITY_NAME
Verizon Business: MANTECA
STREET_NUMBER
2551
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LOUISE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
19801005
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2551 E LOUISE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231659_2551 E LOUISE_2007-2018.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
298
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software Version installed: N/A <br />Crxnniato the fnilnwinn choeklist- <br />v <br />21 Yes El No' <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />Yes ® No' <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />✓ Yes No' <br />Were all sensors visually inspected, functional tested, and confirmed operational? <br />El Yes ® No* <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest pant of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not interfere with their <br />proper operation? <br />Q Yes No* <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) operational? <br />jj_N/A <br />® Yes No* <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down it the piping secondary containment monitoring system <br />✓ N/A <br />detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive shut -down? (Check all that apply) <br />❑ SumpfTrench Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor <br />failure/disconnection? Yes; No. <br />El Yes <br />No. <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no mechanical overfill prevention <br />® WA <br />valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill point(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent <br />of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? 9 <br />® Yes* p✓ No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? if yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the <br />manufacturer name and model for all re acement pans in Section E, below. <br />Yes* [E]No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check a# that apply) []Product; []Water. If <br />es, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />✓ Yes n No* <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if applicable <br />✓ Yes No* <br />Ams- <br />Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br />- in aection t oeiow, aescnoe now ana wnen mese oenciencies were or was ve correciea. <br />E. Comments: <br />Also tested transition sump (vault) sensor LS600). All Good <br />Monitoring System Certification Page 2 of 4 12107 <br />2 2/21/07 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.