My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2011-2013
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREMONT
>
1617
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231923
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2011-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2024 2:06:52 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:53:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2011-2013
RECORD_ID
PR0231923
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003606
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO 05450
STREET_NUMBER
1617
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
FREMONT
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13511015
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1617 W FREMONT ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231923_1617 W FREMONT_.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9255517888 Line 1 <br />im 6rrr1re-RYAN INC. <br />D, Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software version Installed: 332 <br />Complete the foilowina checklist: <br />14:45:20 08-26-2013 3114 <br />GR Job 20-591947 <br />ry y8s <br />0 o <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />ry Yes <br />0 No` <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />Yes <br />No" <br />Were sit sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br />E Yes <br />® No* <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not Interfere with their <br />proper operation? <br />® Yes <br />® No* <br />if alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communication equipment (e.g. modem) operational? <br />[j NIA <br />ff Yes <br />® No* <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shutdown If the piping secondary containment monitoring system <br />13 N/A <br />detects a leak, falls to operate, or is electrically dlsconnacted? If yes: which sensors initiate positive shut -down? (Check alf that apply) <br />19 Sump/Trench Sensor; E Dispenser Containment Sensor. Did you confirm positive shut -dawn due to leaks gind sensor <br />failure/disconnection? E Yes; ❑ No. <br />E Yes <br />No* <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e, no mechanical overfill prevention <br />(] N/A <br />valve is installed), Is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill point(s) and operating property? If so, at what percent <br />of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? 90 <br />E Yes <br />D No <br />Was any mon oring equipment replaced? If yes, Identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the <br />manufacturer name and model for all re lacementits In Section E, below. <br />Yes <br />No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply} ®Product Water. If <br />yes, describe ceases in Section E, below. <br />Ij es <br />❑ No* <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to Insure proper settings? Attach set-up reports, if applicable. <br />Yes <br />No* <br />I Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacture'secific ations? <br />E. Comments: <br />replaced 871maln stp sump sensor (323), also replaced 87 siphon fill sump sensor (344) <br />small amount of liquid found in disp 3/4 <br />Monitoring system certification Page 2 of 4 <br />F] <br />12f07 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.