Laserfiche WebLink
BP West Coast Products LLC <br /> Up RECEWPOl <br /> U P.O.Box 6038 <br /> Artesia,CA 90702-6038 <br /> Phone:(360)526-3917 AUG 12 2015 <br /> Fax: (360)371-1742 <br /> Email:sarah.samuels@bp.com ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTIJ <br /> PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> August 10, 2015 <br /> Inspector Cindy Vo <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, CA 95205 <br /> Subject: Underground Storage Tank Program Inspection Report <br /> Facility#05450 <br /> 1617 W. Fremont St. <br /> Stockton, CA 95203 <br /> Dear Inspector Vo, <br /> This letter is in response to the Underground Storage Tank Program Inspection Report, dated July 28, <br /> 2015, which was issued to the subject facility. Please be advised that the following issues have been <br /> addressed: <br /> CCR 2632 monitoring and response plans not current or approved by the EHD. The <br /> monitoring plan of all three tanks listed the UDC monitoring leak sensor model as 323, but <br /> verified on site during the inspection that the sensor is a 208. On July 29, 2015, Belshire <br /> Environmental Services updated the Monitoring Plans for all tanks to show 208 sensors in the UDCs <br /> and resubmitted the revised Monitoring Plans on CERS. Updated copies of the Monitoring Plans are <br /> attached for your review and records, and additional copies are scheduled to be placed on site <br /> during the next Designated Operator Inspection on August 18, 2015. <br /> The response plan on site lacked the locations of spill control equipment and a date of when <br /> the response plan was signed by Sarah Samuels. The location of the spill control equipment is <br /> not noted on the Response Plan because the equipment is permanently on site and is therefore <br /> noted in the Contingency Plan portion of the Hazardous Materials Business Plan. A copy of the <br /> Contingency Plan portion of the HMBP, which was previously submitted on CERS, is attached for <br /> your review and records. <br /> It is unclear why the site copy of the Response Plan did not contain a signature date, as the <br /> signature date is visible on the CERS submittal. However, a replacement copy of the Response <br /> Plan will be placed on site during the next Designated Operator Inspection and the signature date <br /> will be verified to be visible. A copy of the signed and dated Response Plan is attached for your <br /> review and records. <br /> CCR 2635(b)(2)Overfill prevention system not present, was overridden, or failed to meet <br /> overfill requirements. The external audio alarm used as part of the overfill prevention system <br /> is not currently functional on the automatic tank gauge (ATG)of USTs during the time of <br /> inspection. This was corrected on site. As noted in your Inspection Report, BP testing and <br /> maintenance vendor, Gettler-Ryan Inc., repaired the audible portion of the overfill alarm on site <br /> during your inspection, and it was retested with passing results. <br />