COMPLIANCE INFO_2011-2018 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Vapor Recovery) upgrade. No issues regarding well or septic programs." written on it by the EHD counter staff (Attachment 34). This stamp is used to inform the San Joaquin County Community Development Department that the EHD either has no objections to a building permit being issued, or that there are conditions that need to be met. Ms. Lopez claimed that this was the approval she received for the EVR permit from the EHD. On February 11, 2010, Mr. Wong drove by the facility and took photos of what appeared to be newly installed equipment (Attachment 35). On February 26, 2010, Ms. Lopez called and left a voicemail for Mr. Wong asking to schedule an inspection for permit SR0057217. Mr. Wong called back and stated that there was no inspection because the permit was never approved. Ms. Lopez began to get angry with Mr. Wong and wanted to speak to his supervisor. Mr. Wong gave Ms. Lopez the contact information for Ms. Kasey Foley, REHS, Program Coordinator, EHD. On March 1, 2010, Ms. Lopez called Ms. Foley to discuss not getting the permit approval. Ms. Lopez explained that they did not install a Healy system as originally stated in the permit application, but installed a Hirt system instead. Ms. Foley asked Ms. Lopez to resubmit the permit application with plans to Mr. Wong. On March 4, 2010, a revised permit application SR0057217 was submitted by Franzen - Hill (Attachment 36). The application indicated the equipment that was installed, but the accompanying site map did not accurately depict the site. The site map showed three previously removed USTs in their former location, dispensers on the wrong side of the canopy posts with conduit trenching going straight to one of them from the building, and did not show the existing USTs or the UST piping. On March 11, 2010, Mr. Wong called Ms. Lopez and explained the deficiencies in the site map that needed to be addressed. Ms. Lopez stated that she would have Mr. Richard Warren of Franzen -Hill contactj Mr. Wong to address the deficiencies in person at the EHD office by Monday, March 15, 2010, since he was scheduled to be in the area. On March 16, 2010, Ms. Lopez called Mr. Wong and left a message stating that Mr. Warren would be at the EHD office on Monday, March 22, 2010, to make the necessary revisions to the site map and address any other discrepancies. Mr. Wong called Ms. Lopez back and left a message stating that date was acceptable, and reiterated what clarifications were needed. On March 18, 2010, Mr. Wong spoke with Mr. Warren and confirmed the appointment on March 22, 2010. Mr. Wong reemphasized that the site map was inaccurate and it needed to clearly show the location of the equipment and that he may have to redraw the site map if it was not clear. Mr. Warren said he understood. On March 22, 2010, Mr. Wong met Mr. Warren at the EHD office. Mr. Wong explained the items on the map that needed to be revised and gave them back to Mr. Warren. Mr. Warren revised the permit application to indicate no cold start of the monitoring panel. On March 23, 2010, Mr. Wong called and reminded Mr. Warren to provide three copies of the site maps and to ensure it showed the locations of the LIST piping to determine if secondary containment testing would be required if trenching was done over them. Mr. Warren stated he would have it done later that week. R