Laserfiche WebLink
r , <br /> SWRCB,January 2002 P 2- of <br /> Page <br /> 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING <br /> Test Method Developed By: an Manufacturer ❑Industry Standard ❑Professional Engineer <br /> 0 . er(Spec) <br /> Test Method Used: 0 Pressure Vacuum 0 Hydrostatic <br /> 0 Other eco) <br /> Test Equipment Used: Q.ctAc��. t S �� Equipment Resolution: 3d /+ <br /> Tank#L Tank#2. t 3 , ank# 'bank# <br /> Is Tank Exempt From Testing?' 0 Yes 9.4Lqo 0 Yes o ' 0 Yes 0 No \0 Yes ❑No/ <br /> Tank Capacity: <br /> Tank Material: F( (ass 5, <br /> Tank Manufacturer: <br /> Product Stored: /w E a taZ u ✓ f <br /> Wait time-bg1ween applying <br /> pressureAWuuiWwater and <br /> startin test: o tti t k(Iu V <br /> Test Start Time: /0 " 60 LO ' 20 <br /> Initial Reading(RI): —/6 G 0 Litt. <br /> Test End Time: L Z U l 2, Ze} <br /> Final Reading(RF): 16 to`-1 <br /> Test Duration: ia/Ad <br /> Change in Reading(RF-N: u <br /> Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: wa to (e b a5 �v�¢ Ac le lamas <br /> Test Result: ass 0 Fail Pass 0 Fail ❑ oss ❑Fa4 0 Pass 0 F411 <br /> Was sensor removed for testing? 0 Yes NTo ❑NA 0 Yesno ❑NA 0 ❑No 0 Yes 0 No ❑ A <br /> Was sensor properly replaced and. ❑yes ❑No A ❑Yes 0 No A Yes ❑No ❑N Yes ❑No ❑N <br /> verified functional after testing? <br /> Comments—(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up forfailed tests) <br /> Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary <br /> containment,such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum,are exempt from periodic containment <br /> testing. {California Code of Regulations,Title 23, Section 2637(x)(6)} <br />