My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2019
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
3515
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0514502
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2020 6:00:52 PM
Creation date
6/26/2020 12:43:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2019
RECORD_ID
PR0514502
PE
2228
FACILITY_ID
FA0003747
FACILITY_NAME
Shell Oil Products US - Stockton Terminal
STREET_NUMBER
3515
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
Dr
City
Stockton
Zip
95203
APN
161-030-02
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3515 Navy Dr
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
775
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E.Training and Drills Version :27.10.4 <br /> Response to Notification <br /> • Emergency Responders <br /> . Total Facility <br /> . Community (as appropriate) <br /> Management of Incident(Incident Command Staff) <br /> • Incident assessment of scene <br /> • Security (of immediate area/reminder of plant) <br /> . Communication/Information needs and flow <br /> • Equipment/Training <br /> . Medical Aspects <br /> . Continuing Supplies/Manpower <br /> . Cleanup/Decontamination <br /> . All Clear <br /> Outline of Review <br /> Given below are items a team composed of outside people knowledgeable in spill response <br /> and key members of the response teams should examine. These questions are intended as <br /> guidelines only; many other questions are likely to be appropriate at each stage of a critique. <br /> Detection <br /> . Was the spill detected promptly? <br /> . How was it detected? <br /> • By whom? <br /> • Could it have been detected earlier? How? <br /> . Are any instruments or procedures available to consider which might aid in spill <br /> detection? <br /> Notification <br /> . Were proper procedures followed in notifying government agencies? Were <br /> notifications prompt? <br /> . Was management notified promptly? <br /> . Was management response appropriate? <br /> . Was the Facility/Company notified promptly? If so, why, how, and who? If not, why <br /> not? <br /> Assessment/Evaluation <br /> . Was the magnitude of the problem assessed correctly at the start? <br /> . What means were used for this assessment? <br /> . Are any guides or aids needed to assist spill evaluation? <br /> . What sources of information were available on winds and on water currents? <br /> • Is our information adequate? <br /> . Was this information useful (and used) for spill trajectory forecasts? Were such <br /> forecasts realistic? <br /> • Do we have adequate information on product properties? <br /> . Do we need additional information on changes of product properties with time, i.e., as <br /> a result of weathering and other processes? <br /> Shell Supply and Distribution E-12 Stockton Terminal FRP <br /> ©2019 Witt O' Brien's Revision Date:October, 2019 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.