Laserfiche WebLink
The PFAS analyte list, which includes 18 PFAS compounds, was presented. Analysis will be completed <br />by a DoD-Environmental Laboratory Accreditation (ELAP)/National Environmental Laboratory <br />Accreditation Program (NELAP)-certified laboratory. The lab is also CA-ELAP certified. A Level III <br />deliverable will be received from the laboratory, and data will undergo Stage 2b data validation as <br />defined in the DoD General Data Validation Guidelines. <br />A general outline of the schedule was presented. The Final UFP-QAPP will be provided with the <br />responses to CA Water Board comments in April 2021. The field investigation is tentatively planned for <br />May to June 2021. Note: This tentative schedule may be adjusted based on planned re -submittal of the <br />Draft Final QAPP, as discussed below. <br />Under normal circumstances, the team would field verify the proposed locations during a site <br />reconnaissance walk conducted after the TPP meeting; however, that is not possible given the current <br />travel restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Instead, the site walk will be performed during the <br />mark -out and utility clearing. <br />Open Discussion (Slide 24): <br />• Due to the presence of a former wash rack, the SI sample locations may be adjusted to determine the <br />presence or absence of PFAS from this potential source area. Mr. Pierce suggested that one of the <br />boring locations could be shifted to obtain better coverage of this area. Ms. Stinger will send out revised <br />UFP-QAPP Worksheets and figures to reflect the new potential source area (former wash rack) and <br />associated sample location adjustments. <br />• Existing wells located at the FMS #24, southwest corner of the CAARNG facility, may be gauged to <br />support the determination of a northeast groundwater gradient. Mr. Brian Pierskalla (CAARNG) <br />confirmed a November 2020 groundwater monitoring event at FMS #24 showed a northeast <br />groundwater flow. This groundwater monitoring report is still in draft phase but will be published soon. <br />He noted the nine existing monitoring wells at FMS #24 will likely be accessible for gauging during the <br />SI. He re -stated all six monitoring wells near the former wash rack/underground storage tank have been <br />abandoned. <br />• Ms. Stinger asked about CA Water Board's position on the timeframe for leaving a temporary well open <br />and the well permitting process. Marcus Pierce (CA Water Board) stated that this was more a San <br />Joaquin County issue but given that the temporary wells will likely be abandoned within a week and the <br />facility property is secured, he had no issues with use of a CERCLA waiver to allow installation of the <br />proposed temporary wells. However a well permit will be required for permanent well installation, and <br />the process for obtaining a permit from San Joaquin County may delay the project by a year. Revised <br />language in the QAPP is also needed if a well permit is pursued. To avoid significant project delays, all <br />parties were in agreement that a CERCLA waiver would be invoked to allow installation of temporary <br />wells. <br />• Mr. Murphy (CA Water Board) mentioned that there was an ongoing PFAS investigation at the adjoining <br />municipal airport. However, the status of the investigation is unknown. <br />• Mr. Pierce stated that per state requirements, the final SI UFP-QAPP will need to be stamped by a <br />California -licensed Professional Engineer (PE). Ms. Stinger will incorporate this requirement into the <br />final deliverable. <br />• Mr. Pierce requested the full package of Standard Operating Procedures. Ms. Stinger will provide this <br />package in the next submittal. <br />• Mr. Murphy indicated that the 30 -day review timeframe for the UFP-QAPP was reasonable and that he <br />already had preliminary comments ready. Dr. Packer suggested that CA Water Board hold off on <br />submitting comments until after reviewing forthcoming revised Stockton QAPP worksheets, to be <br />revised per suggestions made during this TPP1 &2 meeting. <br />• Ms. Stinger asked about the utility clearance process for Stockton AASF. Mr. Pierskalla believes that a <br />private utility locator performed clearance at the FMS site and was not sure if the local 811 operator <br />would be able to access the facility. Ms. Stinger requested the contact information for a local person <br />with knowledge about the facility's utility clearance process. <br />• Mr. John Oberg (CAARNG) confirmed that the investigation -derived waste (IDW) management plan <br />was similar to other CAARNG sites. IDW soil and water will be containerized in drums. If the analytical <br />results show the associated sample(s) is below Office of the Secretary of Defense [OSD] screening <br />levels, IDW may be returned to the ground surface at the source of generation. Otherwise IDW will be <br />ARNG PA/SI, Stockton AASF CA 3 24 February 2021 <br />