Laserfiche WebLink
Ask <br />3. Do proposed boundaries create n island or corridor of unincorporated 0 itory? <br />NO <br />t. Do proposed boundaries split lines of assessment or ownership <br />NO <br />5. Land area affected: a) square miles <br />6. Population in subject area: 0 — <br />8. Registered voter density (per acre): --±- <br />10. Estimate of population increase in next 10 years: <br />0 <br />11. Present land use of subject area: <br />waste disposal site <br />12. What is the intended development of this area: <br />waste disposal site <br />b) acres <br />7. Number of registered voters: <br />9. Number of dwelling units: 0- <br />13. Present zoning: <br />14. Describe proposed zoning changes: <br />none <br />15. Assessed value of land: $ 30, 262 Assessed value of <br />personal property <br />16. Assessed value of improvements: $ $ <br />17. Value of publicly owned land in area: $ L41knOW11 <br />18. Governmental services required by this proposal which are not presently available: <br />General City services upon annexation <br />19.' Wiwi alternative measures would provide services listed in Item 18 above? <br />Retain current County services if area is not annexed <br />20. What modifications must be made to existing utility and governmental facilities to provide services <br />initialed by this proposal? <br />none : <br />21. What approximate costs will be incurred in accomplishing requirements of Item 20 above? <br />. none <br />22. How will such costs be met? <br />n/a <br />23. Will provisions of this proposal impose greater than normal burden on servicing agency or affected <br />property? No, City already servicing adjacent site; this proposal <br />is intended to take advantage of new State legislation to bring <br />the entire 184.31 acre City owned Austin Road waste disposal site <br />under City of Stockton jurisdiction. <br />24. [] Check here if you are submitting further comments and evaluations on additional pages. <br />PAGF 2 <br />