My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993_1
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9069
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440001
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993_1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:09 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:39:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1993_1
RECORD_ID
PR0440001
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004514
FACILITY_NAME
AUSTIN ROAD/ FORWARD LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9069
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9069 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440001_9069 S AUSTIN_1993_1.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
428
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TABLE S.1: SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES (Continued) <br /> Environmental Impact Mitigation Measure Level of Significance After Mitigation <br /> F. Vegetation and Wildlife(Cont.) <br /> (b) Prior to final project approval,the project <br /> proponent should prepare a formal Creek <br /> Realignment and Revegetation Plan(CRRP),and <br /> should submit the CRRP to the CDFG, USFWS, <br /> RWQCB,and Corps for their review and <br /> approval. <br /> (c) Once the CRRP is approved by all concerned <br /> agencies,the project proponent should <br /> implement the CRRP. The modified creek and <br /> associated vegetation should be protected <br /> through fencing. <br /> F.2. Implementation of the proposed project may (a) Prior to final project approval,the project Less than Significant <br /> remove up to thirty-two valley oaks,averaging proponent should employ a qualified arborist to <br /> approximately thirty inches dbh. document all on-site valley oaks as to precise <br /> (SIGNIFICANT) location,diameter at breast height(24 inches <br /> above normal grade),height,canopy radius,and <br /> condition. <br /> (b) Prior to final project approval,the project <br /> proponent should modify proposed project <br /> components to avoid all identified on-site valley <br /> oaks(see Figure III.F.1). <br /> (c) Prior to initiation of any activity within a 100- <br /> foot radius of a valley oak proposed for <br /> retention,the project proponent should install <br /> clearly visible temporary fencing around the <br /> dripline of the valley oak to prevent inadvertent <br /> damage during on-site activities. <br /> 5.15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.