My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993_1
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9069
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440001
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1993_1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:09 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:39:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1993_1
RECORD_ID
PR0440001
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004514
FACILITY_NAME
AUSTIN ROAD/ FORWARD LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9069
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9069 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440001_9069 S AUSTIN_1993_1.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
428
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
V. Alternatives to the Project <br /> Land Uses_Plans. and Policies <br /> The Off-Site Alternative is consistent with current applicable plans and policies. Expansion of <br /> the Foothill Landfill would not be within a 10,000 foot radius of the Stockton Metropolitan <br /> Airport,and therefore would not be subject to review by the Federal Aviation Administration. <br /> Visual and Aesthetics <br /> Like the proposed project, a landfill at the Foothill Landfill site would be visible from nearby <br /> roads. The hilly topography within the vicinity of the alternative site could help make the mound <br /> formed by a landfill at the alternative site seem less out of place. For these reasons,the visual <br /> impacts of a landfill at the alternative site would be adverse but not significant,unlike the <br /> proposed project impacts. <br /> Community Services and Utilities <br /> This alternative would not require any new services to the Foothill Landfill site. <br /> Transportation and Circulation <br /> By an amount greater than the proposed project,a landfill expansion at the alternative location <br /> would increase local traffic due to additional truck trips and increased vehicle miles traveled. <br /> The traffic impacts of the alternative site would be on Waverly Road. Due to the current level of <br /> traffic in the alternative site area,the additional traffic caused by a landfill expansion at the <br /> alternative site probably would not reduce the level of service of any intersections in the area by a <br /> significant amount. Unlike the proposed project, a landfill expansion at the alternative location <br /> could significantly impact the pavement quality of nearby roads, a significant impact. Collection <br /> trucks traveling round trip from the City of Stockton to Austin Road Landfill travel about 16 <br /> miles. Collection trucks traveling to and from the City of Stockton and the Lovelace Transfer <br /> Station would also travel 16 miles round trip. Waste loads from several collection trucks would <br /> be consolidated into a transfer truck and hauled to Foothill Landfill. Vehicles originating from <br /> the Lovelace Transfer Station would have to travel another 64 miles(round trip)to the Foothill <br /> Landfill. <br /> V.10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.