Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Michael M. Niblock, Associate Planner July 20 , 1990 <br /> City of Stockton Page 2 <br /> look the other -way this time around. On January 31, 1990 , DOT/FAA <br /> issued revised Order 5200 . 5A (See Exhibit B) . <br /> 3. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recently revised its <br /> Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR Part 139 ) requirements governing <br /> the certification and operation of Airport facilities and, in <br /> particular, air carrier airports. A new provision has been <br /> included, FAR Part 139.337 - Wildlife Hazard Management, which <br /> basically states that each certificate holder (this means the <br /> Airport and the County of San Joaquin) shall conduct an ecological <br /> study if any number of events occur regarding wildlife (See <br /> Exhibit C) . <br /> Accordingly, the Department of Aviation may be required to imple- <br /> ment such a wildlife hazard management plan and program -- even <br /> though the offending facility is not owned by the Airport or the <br /> County of San Joaquin. The Department of Aviation does not have <br /> the staff, funds, etc. to implement such a program. Additional <br /> funding would have to be requested from the Board of Supervisors if <br /> it became necessary to establish and maintain such a program. <br /> 4. If any modifications to the existing landfill are contemplated, the <br /> Federal Aviation Administration will require the City of Stockton <br /> to file a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration (FAA Form <br /> 7460-1) as prescribed by FAR Part 77 (Objects Affecting Navigable <br /> Airspace) of the Federal Aviation Regulations. Further, any modi- <br /> fications to the existing landfills surrounding the Stockton <br /> Metropolitan Airport (5 mile radii ) must be in accord with Airport <br /> Zoning Regulations consistent with San Joaquin County Airport Land <br /> Use Commission policies and FAA Order 5200.5A. <br /> 5. The Stockton Metropolitan Airport is totally and unequivocally <br /> opposed to any planned expansion and/or continued use beyond what <br /> was originally planned for the Austin Road Landfill site. Further- <br /> more, I fully expect that the City of Stockton will receive written <br /> opposition from the California Division of Aeronautics and the <br /> Federal Aviation Administration on this project as well as public <br /> appearances by both governmental agencies during the public hearing <br /> process. <br /> As emphasized in many other referal communications to City and <br /> County agencies, the County Department of Aviation believes that it <br /> is extremely important to preserve the operational integrity of the <br /> Stockton Metropolitan Airport because of its economic and transpor- <br /> tation value for the future growth and development of this com- <br /> munity, not only for the residents it currently serves but for <br /> future generations to come. Once the Airport® s operational area is <br /> infringed or encroached upon, it will be most difficult if not <br /> impossible to eliminate and/or resolve a hazardous or conflicting <br /> problem. <br />