Laserfiche WebLink
Monitoring Report Compliance Checklist <br /> Discharges Regulated by Title 27 and/or Part 258 <br /> RWQCB <br /> Reference Parameter Yes No N/A Reviewer Comment <br /> WDRs/MRP/ Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Standard <br /> Provisions 1. Are all groundwater Field Parameters X <br /> (Sept 93/Aug 97) Monitoring Parameter, and COCs <br /> (if required) sampled and analyzed? <br /> in. Have any groundwater concentration X VOCs have been detected in <br /> limits been exceeded? If yes, identify MW-1, -3, -4, -5, -6, -10, -11, <br /> -12, -13, & -14. Inorganics are <br /> in comments. elevated in MW-3, -4, &-11. <br /> n. Is there a description and graphical X <br /> presentation of groundwater flow <br /> direction and gradient? <br /> o. Monitoring Wells: Is there a X <br /> description,method,and time <br /> of water level measurement and <br /> well recovery time? <br /> p. Purging: Is there a description X <br /> of the purging method,purge <br /> pump and its placement, and <br /> field parameters? <br /> Additional Comments and Recommendations: <br /> This site has an active groundwater treatment facility since 1994, as part of a corrective action program. The <br /> current treatment system has failed to contain or cleanup the contaminant plume. The discharger has begun <br /> work on a new corrective action plan to capture the entire plume and clean up groundwater. Summary of <br /> wells exceeding groundwater concentration limits. <br /> Detection Monitoring Wells: MW-6, -12, -13, and—14—VOCs. <br /> Evaluation Monitoring Wells: MW-1, -3, -4, -5, -10, and—11 —VOCs <br /> MW-3, -4, and—11 —one or more inorganic parameter. <br /> Third Quarter 2000 sampling data was not collected due to confusion over responsibility for monitoring <br /> created when City of Stockton sold the facility to Allied. <br /> RWQCB Staff Signature: <br /> Date: - <br />