Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Mike Miller -2 - 3 September 1999 <br /> "Surface drainage from tributary areas and internal site drainage from surface or subsurface <br /> sources shall not contact or percolate through wastes,and shall either be contained on-site or be <br /> discharged in accordance with applicable storm water regulations." <br /> The current condition of the southern perimeter ditch does not appear to comply with the facility's <br /> WDRs. The City must ensure the drainage channels are properly graded and maintained to prevent <br /> violations from occurring. The plan to use sandbags and pumps to ensure drainage is permissible as <br /> backup plan,but cannot be used a primary means of compliance with the drainage requirements in the <br /> WDRs. Please note that overflow of contaminated storm water into Littlejohns Creek would be a <br /> violation of the facility's WDRs, storm water permit and the Clean Water Act. <br /> My understanding from our meeting is that access, especially during wet weather,to the south side of <br /> the landfill is limited by the poor'condition of the perimeter road. Given the concerns about the poor <br /> drainage in this area and the potential to violate WDRs,wet weather access must be ensured before this <br /> rainy season begins. <br /> Erosion of the right bank of Littlejohn Creek has locally reduced the width of the southern perimeter <br /> road. This condition* contributes to the poor access to the south side of the landfill. Continued erosion <br /> could impinge on the landfill unit itself. Discharge Prohibition A. 8 states: <br /> "The discharge of waste within 50 feet of surface waters not relatedto landfill drainage structures <br /> is prohibited." <br /> The City must ensure proper measures are taken to remedy this erosion problem. <br /> A low area exists long the south central portion of the landfill's top deck. This area has the potential to <br /> pond water during storm events. This area should be brought up to grade and covered prior to the rainy <br /> season. <br /> The adequacy of interim cover soil on the landfill is a long standing concern. My letter of 2 November <br /> 1998 expressed this concern and cited the performance requirements in Title 27 for interim_ cover. The �r <br /> one foot of soil as placed on the City's landfill to meet minimum prescriptive standard for interim cover) <br /> may not be sufficient to meet the performance requirements of Title 27. The wet weather operations plan <br /> should discuss the adequacy of the interim soil cover. <br /> The wet weather operations plan should be submitted to us by 27 September 1999. The plan should <br /> clearly explain how the City will achieve and maintain compliance with its WDRs throughout the rainy <br /> season.If you have any questions,please call me at(9167.255-3131. <br /> STEVE E.ROSENBZ - <br /> Associate Engineering Geologist <br /> Enclosures(2) <br /> cc: Mr. Jeff Hackett, California Integrated Waste Management Board, Sacramento <br /> Ms.Frances McChesney, Office of Chief Counsel, State Water Resources Control Board, <br /> Sacramento <br /> SFR Austin iosp 9.1.99 <br />