My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1996_1
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9069
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440001
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1996_1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:10 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:40:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1996_1
RECORD_ID
PR0440001
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004514
FACILITY_NAME
AUSTIN ROAD/ FORWARD LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9069
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9069 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440001_9069 S AUSTIN_1996_1.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
460
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2-47 SECTION 2-SITE OPERATIONS PLAN <br /> contract with a private firm to perform all or a portion of the work. After construction is complete, <br /> public employees would operate and maintain the facility on a force account basis. <br /> In this case, control is at a maximum since all decisions are made by the City and all personnel <br /> work directly for the City. There could be lower annual operating and maintenance expenses <br /> because there is no annual overhead and profit ccmponent of the service fee paid to a private <br /> entity. The same regulations apply to the operation of the landfill whether it is owned/operated <br /> privately or publicly (regulations are listed in Section 1 of this report). In addition, the liability <br /> exposure for the City is not significantly different from the public ownership/private operation <br /> scenario as the City, as owner, is ultimately responsible for the landfill. Public operation simply <br /> gives the City maximum control over all aspects of the landfill operation. <br /> The perception of the public to this alternative can be either positive or negative depending on <br /> the local philosophy of government. The government can be viewed as providing required ser- <br /> vices to its citizens and its legitimacy will be reinfcrced. However, as there is a relatively large <br /> public resource commitment involved, some individuals may contend that such a facility could be <br /> better managed in the private sector; the facility may then become a disadvantage to the City <br /> Administration. <br /> Because full ownership and control responsibility is taken on, the full risks of revenue and <br /> expense management are assumed by the City. If employees incurliabilities in the execution of <br /> their duties, the City also becomes liable. There is also the potential that the costs of developing <br /> and operating the facility(ies) may be greater than the fees and revenues obtained. Thus, there <br /> is a risk that other revenue sources within the City will be required until such time rates can be <br /> appropriately adjusted. There is also a regulatory risk borne by the City since air and water <br /> quality standards may become even more stringent. <br /> Since the City is currently contracting the operation of the landfill, the City would need to acquire <br /> all operating equipment required for operation. The City would have the option of purchase or <br /> lease; however, acquisition of all new equipment could be costly as compared to the contract <br /> operator's cost. New heavy equipment is normally amortized over 6-8 years depending on its <br /> use. <br /> Staffing and equipment levels for the landfill operation is discussed in Section 2.5. Assuming <br /> equivalent equipment requirements and staffing levels for City force account operations, the <br /> capital (equipment) and operating personnel costs for the first year of operation by the City would <br /> be as shown on Tables 2-8 and 2-9 below. <br /> C.'Y of S"acKmon R.W.Back and Associates <br /> 1811.002 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.