Laserfiche WebLink
Austin Road Landfill Appendix D <br /> Contaminant Plume Characterization Report Aquifer Test Methods <br /> Groundwater generated from the testing operations was conveyed by underground pipe to the <br /> onsite groundwater treatment facility. This permitted facility consists of an air stripper that treats <br /> extracted groundwater prior to its discharge into Little Johns Creek,adjacent to the site. <br /> Aquifer Test Results <br /> Aquifer pumping and recovery tests were performed December 4-191997,at the ARL site. <br /> The purpose of the aquifer test was to obtain information on the aquifer parameters that describe <br /> ground water flow in the alluvial aquifer in this region. The aquifer parameters of interest in this <br /> study are hydraulic conductivity(K),transmissivity(T)and storage coefficient(S). The K value can <br /> be used to calculate the flow velocity of ground water and of any dissolved phase constituents <br /> migrating in the ground water. The T and S values can be used to estimate long term aquifer yield, <br /> the size of cones of depression around pumping wells,and the size and shape of capture zones <br /> associated with pumping wells. <br /> This section discusses the methods and procedures used to evaluate the aquifer parameters.The <br /> _ procedures for analyzing the constant-rate pumping and recovery tests included downloading and <br /> conversion of the data from automated data loggers,correction of the data,selection and <br /> implementation of the appropriate aquifer analysis methods,and evaluation of the results. <br /> Data Handling and Processing <br /> Ten observation wells were monitored for changes in water levels associated with pumping of wells <br /> -1 and -2. Water levels were measured with downhole pressure transducer/data logger <br /> monitors(Trolls)throughout the recovery and pumping test phases,and were also measured <br /> manually during portions of the test. The Troll water level data were downloaded onto a laptop <br /> computer and evaluated every four to twelve hours to determine when each phase of the aquifer <br /> test could be terminated. <br /> The water level data files were processed by importing them into a spreadsheet software package <br /> (EXCEL)and combining the individual data files from a given data logger. Chronological gaps <br /> in the data files between the end of one test phase and the start of the next test phase at a given well <br /> were corrected by comparing times in the field log book with starting and ending times as indicated <br /> in the data files. In addition,the Troll data for new test phases had the initial water level set equal <br /> - to a drawdown of zero,so water level data in these situations was corrected by adding a constant <br /> value equal to the observed drawdown from the previous aquifer test phase. This step was <br /> undertaken to verify that the Trolls were recording data correctly at the start of each new test phase. <br /> All water level data were plotted and reviewed graphically for these and other data handling issues. <br /> The analytical methods used to evaluate the aquifer test data contain a variety of simplifying <br /> - assumptions which make the complex mathematics of the analytical methods solvable. Some of the <br /> assumptions include: <br /> • a constant aquifer saturated thickness, <br /> • an insignificant amount of water stored in the borehole of the pumping well. <br /> • a constant pumping rate at the pumping well, <br /> CDM Camp Dresser&McKee CS 0 D-5 <br /> W:IREPORTS4City of 10f Stockton 199 52 <br /> 08550006 <br />