My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1999
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9069
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440001
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:09 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:40:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1999
RECORD_ID
PR0440001
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004514
FACILITY_NAME
AUSTIN ROAD/ FORWARD LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9069
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
9069 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440001_9069 S AUSTIN_1999.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
337
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Austin Road Landfill Appendix D <br /> Contaminant Plume Characterization Report Aquifer Test Methods _ <br /> • a pumping well whose well screen penetrates the full saturated thickness of the <br /> aquifer,and <br /> • a water surface which remains static over the duration of the test except as affected <br /> by the pumping well <br /> Other assumptions unique to a certain aquifer test evaluation method are discussed in the next <br /> section. To see if any of the above general assumptions were violated during the test and if <br /> correction factors were needed,the data underwent several types of preprocessing and evaluation <br /> as described below. <br /> Aquifer thickness evaluation <br /> The assumption of a constant aquifer saturated thickness is based on the difference of the static <br /> (nonpumping)water table surface and the base of the aquifer. Historic groundwater data show a <br /> depth to water of about 80 feet and a decrease in the water surface elevation of about 4 feet over the <br /> area of the aquifer test observation wells. Lithologic results from deeper boreholes in the area show <br /> a clay-rich layer starting at about 125 feet below ground surface,encountered at the MW-6 and <br /> MW-7 locations and in temporary borehole ARL-IA drilled as part of concurrent site investigations <br /> (Figure 1),. These three locations form a triangle covering most of the area comprising the <br /> observation well network. The consistent depth of the base of the aquifer and the relatively small <br /> change in ground water surface elevation makes the assumption of a constant aquifer thickness a <br /> reasonable one over the scale of the site. <br /> The difference in e depth to water and depth to the clay layer is the aquifer saturated thickness of <br /> the uppermost aquifer layer. Based on information presented above,the average saturated <br /> thickness is about 45 feet. <br /> Borehole storage evaluation <br /> The issue of borehole storage is relevant in estimating the time over which aquifer drawdown data <br /> from the Pumping-1 and Pumping-2 test phases may be influenced by water being evacuated from <br /> the well boreholes. This effect was evaluated using the method presented by Walton(1987),which <br /> estimates the time after pumping starts for which the effects of well bore storage on measured <br /> drawdown become minimal(less than 1 percent). Using reported borehole diameters of 13 inches <br /> for wells EW-1 and EW-2(EMCON, 1991),pump eductor pipe diameters of 4 inches and an <br /> assumed aquifer K value of 100 feet per day,this method indicates that borehole storage effects are <br /> insignificant after about 17 minutes. Due to the length of each pumping test phase,the assumption <br /> of no wellbore storage can also assumed to be met. <br /> Constant pumping rate evaluation <br /> The assumption of a constant pumping rate at the test well(EW-1)was evaluated by plotting <br /> pumping rates as a function of time. The aquifer test analysis methods described below require that <br /> the pumping rate fluctuates less than about 10 percent over the region that the data are analyzed <br /> (Stallman,1971). Totalizing flow meters installed downstream of each well pump were used to <br /> determine pumping rates over time periods ranging from one minute to several hours. The <br /> calculated pumping rates remained reasonably consistent for a given test phase,although there <br /> appear to be differences in the pumping rate of each well when they are operating alone or together. <br /> CDM Camp Dresser&McKee D-6 <br /> - <br /> W.\REPORTS\STOCKTOWRLPLUME.9MPPD.WPD CS 010853 <br /> City of Stockton 190855.0006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.