My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2003
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAVERLY
>
6484
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440004
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:21 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:41:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2003
RECORD_ID
PR0440004
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004517
FACILITY_NAME
FOOTHILL LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
6484
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAVERLY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
Zip
95236
APN
09344002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6484 N WAVERLY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440004_6484 N WAVERLY_2003.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
996
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Foothill Sanitary Landfill—Module 1 December 2003 <br /> County of San Joaquin Job No.031602.00.02 <br /> compacted in place with a CAT 815 sheepsfoot compactor. After compaction of the <br /> bottom 6-inches, the windrowed material was then placed back on top of the <br /> compacted areas, moisture conditioned (with a water truck and a motor grader), and <br /> compacted (also with a CAT 815 sheepsfoot compactor). <br /> The foundation layer was then tested for density and moisture content with a nuclear <br /> density gauge. In addition, sandcone tests (ASTM D-1556) were also performed as <br /> discussed in the ensuing density verification section. Samples for sieve analysis were <br /> collected to verify that the gradation requirements were met. <br /> During placement of the foundation layer, Vector's CQA Monitor obtained samples of <br /> the material and performed Atterberg limits and sieve analyses (including a sieve wash) <br /> to ensure the material met the project specifications. The material on the base of <br /> Module 1 met the project specifications for particle size with the exception of <br /> approximately 10 acres. The material in these areas were a sandy material that did not <br /> have more than 30% fines, as required. The material in these areas were over <br /> excavated, removed, and replaced with on-site material that did meet the project <br /> specifications for percent fines. The areas of foundation layer that were removed and <br /> replaced with suitable material are identified on Figure 1. <br /> After the foundation layer was recompacted, field density tests were conducted with a <br /> nuclear density gauge to ensure 90% relative compaction. The moisture content or the <br /> foundation layer was determined by the oven drying method (ASTM D2216) to ensure a <br /> moisture content of 0 to 4% wet of optimum moisture content. The dry density obtained <br /> by the nuclear gauge was modified based on the oven dry moisture content. This <br /> modified value for the dry density was utilized in determining pass or fail for <br /> compaction. Test and sample locations for the foundation layer soils are shown in <br /> Figures 2, 3 and 4. <br /> Vector Engineering,Inc.• 143E Spring Hill Drive•Grass Valley,CA 95945•(530)272-2448 <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.