Laserfiche WebLink
NOT PROPOSED AT THIS TIME <br /> Soil Cover and Drainage Improvements <br /> Soil cover and drainage improvements are not proposed as corrective action because <br /> groundwater impact was not indicated in the EMP. However, the County will enhance soil cover <br /> at the site and ensure drainage facilities comply with the Waste Discharge Requirements and <br /> Title 27, Section 20365. This will increase assurances that minimal amounts of water will enter <br /> the landfill, reducing the potential for accelerated landfill gas production. The County will <br /> prepare a Cover and Drainage Plan (anticipated in 2004), in which the drainage system will be <br /> improved as needed to ensure minimal water infiltration. <br /> Landfill Gas System <br /> A Landfill Gas(LFG) System is not proposed at this time due the lack of VOC contamination at <br /> this time. <br /> Title 27 (Section 20425 (b)(3)) suggests that an LFG System is the appropriate corrective action <br /> measure if the source of contamination is landfill gas. Such indication would include the <br /> presence of VOCs in groundwater. Therefore, an LFG System would be considered as the <br /> corrective action measure if groundwater contamination due to landfill gas is verified. <br /> Closure of Module "I" <br /> Closure of Module"I"is not proposed as corrective action because VOCs were not detected in <br /> this EMP, and groundwater impact is not indicated. The County intends to proceed with the <br /> development of the landfill, and closure of the landfill surface, as the final elevations are <br /> reached. However,the County will evaluate closure of Module"I"as corrective action against <br /> groundwater contamination by leachate migration,if closure is found to be appropriate. <br /> Closure of Module"I"is contra-indicated as corrective action against landfill gas impact <br /> indicated by the presence of VOCs. Decreasing the permeability of the landfill surface by <br /> installing a closure cap would increase the pressure within the landfill and promote migration of <br /> LFG into the vadose zone and closer to the groundwater. <br /> Present practices at the site to reduce water infiltration are apparently successful, such that no <br /> further corrective action appears to be needed at this time. <br /> Although not proposed as corrective action, the County intends to close Module"I"in <br /> coordination with the development of the surrounding lined landfill modules. At this time it is <br /> understood that placement of waste over Module"I", made possible by.the installation of an <br /> adjacent lined modules,will require a composite liner or equivalent between the new refuse and <br /> the refuse of Module"I", constituting internal closure of the affected portion of Module"I". It is <br /> anticipated that approximately 13 acres (16% of the footprint) of Module"I"would be covered <br /> with the expansion of Module 1 up the southern slope of Module"I"within the next five years. <br /> Engineering Feasibility Report 6 Foothill Sanitary Landfill <br /> October 30,2003 San Joaquin County Solid Waste <br />