Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />n <br />u <br />'J <br />n <br />7 <br />L <br />i] <br />11 <br />ii <br />Elevated M.ethod Reporting Limits: <br />The reporting limit is elevated for Dalapon in samples MW -4 and MW -5. The chromatogram indicated the presence <br />of non -target background components. The matrix interference prevented adequate resolution of the target <br />compound at the reporting limit. The results are flagged to indicate the matrix interference. <br />The MDL is elevated for Dalapon in sample Method Blank KWG0708426-3. The chromatogram indicated the <br />presence of non -target background components, which were apparently introduced as laboratory artifacts. The <br />contamination prevented adequate resolution of the target compounds at the MDL. Note the level of background was <br />relatively low compared to the MDL, so the affect on the results was minimal. The results are flagged to indicate <br />the problem. <br />No other anomalies associated with the analysis of these samples were observed. <br />Semivolatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 82700 <br />Initial Calibration (ICAL) Exceptions: <br />The primary evaluation criterion was exceeded for the following analytes inICAL ID CAL6512: Bis(2- <br />chloroisopropyl) Ether, 4-Methylphenol, Naphthalene, 2-Nitroaniline, 2,6-Dinitrotoluene, 2,4-Dinitrotoluene, 4- <br />Nitroaniline. In accordance with CAS standard operating procedures, the alternative evaluation specified in the EPA <br />method was performed using the mean Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) of all analytes in the calibration. The <br />result of the mean RSD calculation was 10,7%. The calibration meets the alternative evaluation criteria. Note that <br />CAS/Kelso policy does not allow the use of averaging if any analyte in the ICAL exceeds 30% RSD. <br />Second Source Exceptions: <br />The upper control criterion was exceeded for Benzidine in Initial Calibration Verification (iCV) MS08/0808FO13.D. <br />The field samples analyzed in this sequence did not contain the analyte in question. Since the apparent problem <br />equates to a potential high bias, the data quality is not affected. No further corrective action was required. <br />Lab Control Sample Exceptions: <br />The advisory criterion was exceeded for the following analytes in Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) KWG0708458: <br />7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene, 7,12-Demethylbenz(a)anthracene and Famphur. As per the CAS/Kelso Standard <br />Operating Procedure (SOP) for this method, these compounds are not included in the subset of analytes used to <br />control the analysis. The recovery information reported for these analytes is for advisory purposes only (i.e. to <br />provide additional detail related to the performance of each individual compound). No further corrective action was <br />required. <br />Relative Percent (Difference Exceptions: <br />Tlie advisory criterion was exceeded for the following analytes in Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) KWG0708458 <br />and KWG0708458: 2-Naphthyllamine, 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine, 7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene, Famphur and <br />Kepone. As per the CAS/Kelso Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for this method, these compounds are not <br />included in the subset of analytes used to control the analysis. The relative difference information for these analytes <br />are for advisory purposes only (i.e. to provide additional detail related to the performance of each individual <br />compound). No further corrective action was required. <br />No other anomalies associated with the analysis of these samples were observed. <br />Approved by t � 5a 01- 37 _- Date -q, -10 037 <br />