Laserfiche WebLink
the closure of Module "I" as corrective action because Module "I"is unlined and"assumed to be the source <br /> of contamination". These WDRs also required the monitoring of soil gas for VOCs. Groundwater <br /> contamination was not indicated at that time. <br /> In June 2003, one and one-half years after the last detection of VOCs at MW-3,the Evaluation Monitoring <br /> Program was completed. Groundwater samples from temporary borings were found free of contaminants, <br /> consistent with data from the permanent monitoring wells since February 2002. A soil gas well, SG-1, was <br /> bored to sample soil gas above the water table near groundwater monitoring well MW-3. Four VOCs were <br /> detected at SG-1;however,these compounds were not detected in the water samples taken at MW-3 at that <br /> time. Monitoring data from MW-3 until most recently did not show an impact by VOCs. <br /> Based on that data, the County concluded that the corrective action of removing the ponding had prevented <br /> further groundwater impact at that time. <br /> On September 16,2003, due to delay in submitting the results of the Evaluation Monitoring Plan, the <br /> CVRWQCB issued a Water Code Section 13267 Order. This Order required that the County submit the <br /> results of the Evaluation Monitoring Program and an Engineering Feasibility Report that includes closure of <br /> Module `I'. That Order did not require the submittal of a Closure Plan(the Preliminary Closure Plan was on <br /> file with RWQCB at that time). <br /> On October 30, 2003, the County submitted a final Engineering Feasibility report to the CVRWQCB <br /> presenting the results of the Evaluation Monitoring Program which indicated that the groundwater was no <br /> longer impacted. Corrective action was identified as completed in 1998 -preventing further ponding on the <br /> landfill surface near MW-3. Closure of Module "I"was discussed,but was not proposed as further <br /> corrective action due to the apparent success of previous corrective action indicated by the of lack of <br /> groundwater contamination. <br /> On December 16,2003, an Administrative Civil Liability Complaint was issued by the CVRWQCB for"not <br /> submitting a Closure Plan for Module `I"'. At that time, groundwater contamination had not been detected at <br /> MW-3 for nearly two years and no other groundwater monitoring well indicated contamination: groundwater <br /> was not impacted. <br /> Negotiations in January 2004 resulted in a Clean Up and Abatement Order which requires the County to <br /> initiate the Foothill Landfill Site Improvement Project, which included: <br /> • Final closure of the top deck area of Module "I" <br /> • Installation of a barrier between Module"I" and the future refuse placed over Module "I" in <br /> extension and completion of Module 1 <br /> • Landfill gas collection <br /> • Placing Partial Cover of those surfaces of Module "I"that are not covered by the inter-Module <br /> barrier or final closure <br /> • Installation of two groundwater monitoring wells <br /> This project was to be pursued in lieu of complete closure of Module"I". On July 20, 2004, the San Joaquin <br /> County Board of Supervisors approved a contract with Kleinfelder to design the Site Improvement Project. <br /> In mid-2006,the gas-impermeable HDPE liner material was placed over Module"I" refuse. <br /> Foothill Sanitary Landfill 5 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 1"Semester 2012 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—July 17,2012 <br />