Laserfiche WebLink
By February 2007, five years after the groundwater was found to be impact-free, construction of the Site <br /> Improvement Project was substantially complete;however, the vegetation in the evapotranspirative (ET) <br /> cover was not well established. Further work was needed to establish the vegetation. <br /> This project also included a barrier between existing Module"I"refuse and new refuse. At the direction of <br /> RWQCB staff, the County installed a gas-tight barrier equivalent to a base landfill liner such as is required to <br /> place refuse on native soil. <br /> In November 2007,the ET area was again reseeded, but growth remained insufficient for adequate ET cover. <br /> In November 2008,the closure cap soil was amended and fertilized, and again seeded. <br /> In the spring of 2009,vegetation was growing healthily on the ET cap area. <br /> On June 10, 2009, CVRWQCB staff issued a notice of violation for discharge of wastes outside of <br /> containment due to the presence of VOCs in the soil within County property. Refuse was not discharged at <br /> those locations. <br /> On March 4, 2009, San Joaquin County staff noticed that the landfill gas (LFG) condensate pump discharge <br /> was connected to the secondary leachate sump of Module 1 rather than to the LCRS. <br /> In April 2009,the LFG condensate was removed from the secondary sump, and the soil gas trench(installed <br /> beneath the liner of Module 1) was activated to enhance the protection of groundwater. <br /> An investigation in October 2009 indicated that the condensate had been forced between the primary and <br /> secondary liner up the side of the landfill, and had been discharged a few feet below ground surface into the <br /> anchor trench along the side of the landfill where the primary and secondary liners terminate. <br /> In March 2011,the continuing removal of liquid from the secondary sump, including increased removal <br /> during a high-water level event in the primary sump, indicated hydraulic communication between the <br /> primary and secondary sump. <br /> In October 2011, as agreed by District staff,the County installed automatic pump in the secondary sump to <br /> maintain the liquid head above the liner below 12", in accordance with CC Title 27. This pump continues to <br /> operate. <br /> VOCs were again confirmed in MW-3 in the first quarter 2011, approximately four years after covering <br /> portions of Module"P'with HDPE liner material. This was the first VOC detection in this well since fourth <br /> quarter 2001. No other well indicates impact. <br /> In considering the timeline of detections and corrective actions, a four or five year lag between action and <br /> result may be apparent: <br /> • Winter of 1995/96 and continuing through three winters: water ponded over refuse near MW-3 <br /> • 1998: ponding corrected <br /> • March 2001 (five years after the start of ponding): VOCs indicated at MW-3 <br /> • February 2002 (four years after ponding was corrected): VOC impact is no longer seen at MW-3 <br /> • 2002 to 2006: MW-3 is free of VOCs without a LFG system in operation <br /> Foothill Sanitary Landfill 6 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 1s`Semester 2012 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—July 17,2012 <br />