My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2015
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAVERLY
>
6484
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440004
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:49 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:46:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2015
RECORD_ID
PR0440004
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004517
FACILITY_NAME
FOOTHILL LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
6484
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAVERLY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
Zip
95236
APN
09344002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6484 N WAVERLY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440004_6484 N WAVERLY_2015.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
724
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
As-Built CQA Report for the Construction of Area 2A at the Foothill Sanitary Landfill <br /> San Joaquin County,California <br /> • The AES' CQA team was led by Michael Raub, C.E.G. as the CQA Manager, and was supported by <br /> Earthworks and Geosynthetics CQA Monitors. The overall CQA program was performed under the <br /> technical review of Kris Khilnani, PE, GE,the AES Principal-In-Charge for the project. <br /> The daily field reports of CQA activities are included in Appendix A.Selected photographs of various <br /> construction activities are included in Appendix B. <br /> 1.4 PROJECT DOCUMENTS <br /> The following project documents were used to implement the construction and CQA services for the <br /> Area 2A composite liner construction: <br /> ■ "Specifications (Including Special Provisions, Notices to Bidders, Bid and Contract) for the <br /> Construction of Area 2A at the Foothill Sanitary Landfill," prepared by the County, dated <br /> December 10, 2014,and Addendum 1 dated January 30, 2015. <br /> ■ Construction Drawings prepared by Geosyntec,dated December 10, 2014. <br /> ■ Construction Quality Assurance Manual prepared by Geosyntec,dated November, 2014. <br /> ■ Standard Specifications, Department of Transportation,State of California,dated 2010. <br /> ■ Standard Plans, Department of Transportation, State of California, dated 2010. <br /> • In addition, some modifications to Specifications, Construction Drawings and design details were <br /> implemented based on the exposed site conditions and requests for variances from the Contractor, <br /> as reviewed and approved by the County and the Design A-E firm, Geosyntec. The major revisions <br /> are listed in the following section. <br /> 1.5 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION AND DESIGN VARIANCES <br /> A few specification revisions were made during Area 2A liner construction based on the material <br /> availability and exposed site conditions.These revisions are listed below: <br /> a. Foundation Layer Particle Size: The maximum particle size for the foundation layer was <br /> specified at 3/s-inch and the CQA Manual further defined the maximum clod size of 1-inch. <br /> During the placement of the foundation layer,the Contractor made repeated passes with the <br /> compaction equipment to reduce clod size; however, sampling of the foundation layer <br /> during placement revealed minor amount of(approximately 3 to 5 percent) clods between <br /> 1-inch and 2-inch size. Laboratory gradation analysis of samples of the placed foundation <br /> layer soil indicated that when subject to normal laboratory procedure for sieve analysis per <br /> ASTM D422, the maximum particle size was less than 3/s inch (see Appendix E.2). Based on <br /> this data, it was concluded that the presence of this small amount of clods would not affect <br /> the performance of the foundation layer and the foundation layer material was deemed <br /> • acceptable. <br /> PA14 Projects114-101(SJCDPW North County and Foothillffoothill CQA1Report\Final ReportToothill CQA Rport-Final.docx <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.