CORRESPONDENCE_2006-2009 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

z Mr. Robert McClellon 2 RE: Forward landfill - Five Year Permit Review Preliminary Closure/Post-Closure Maintenance Plan (Amendment No. 3 and No. 4) Page 2 of 3 • Table 4 - Annual Post -Closure Cost Maintenance and Monitoring Cost Estimate Summary; and • New -Attachment 2 -Stage IA Partial Final Closure/Post-Closure Maintenance Plan (dated June 2005). Amendment No. 3, as it relates to PCPCMP Sections 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0, includes pages in "revision tracking" format for use in identifying text changes in this amended document. t qj • Updated cover (outer and inner) and spine; • Updated TOC, pages i, ii, iii, and iv (discard previous page v [now page iv]); • Amended PCPCMP pages 1-5, 1-6,3-16, 5-1 and 5-2*; • New - Section 6.0-A Professional Certification of Accuracy - Amendment No. 4 (page 6A-1); • Updated Table 2 - Diminishing Landfill Capacity; • Updated Table 8 - Annual Post -Closure Cost Maintenance and Monitoring Cost Estimate Summary (Discard Table 8 - Closure Cost Estimate Summary; Replace with attached Table 8 [previously Table 9]); and • Updated Appendix B - Financial Assurance Documentation. *The attached amended pages 5-1 and 5-2 now comprise Section 5.0, in its entirety. Previously, Section 5.0 consisted of pages 5-1 through 5-4. As you know, recently promulgated regulations under 27 CCR require an operator to provide more detailed back-up in support of the closure and post -closure maintenance cost estimates. Generally, the cost estimates included in a PCPCMP serve as the basis for necessary funding. However, 27 CCR does allow an operator to propose a phased closure approach for their landfill. In 2004, Forward Incorporated prepared and submitted Amendment No. 2, which reflected phased closure of the Forward Landfill. Amendment No. 2 of the PCPCMP was subsequently approved and serves as the basis of the closure cost for the Forward Landfill. SWT completed an updated closure cost estimate for the maximum extent reflected in the attached Amendment No. 3, including the newly required additional back-up cost information. The updated cost estimate for Post -Closure Maintenance and Monitoring (as part of Amendment No. 3 and Amendment No. 4), including necessary back-up, is also included in this submittal to the local Enforcement Agency and California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). The CIWMB has yet to determine what constitutes acceptable cost back-up information. SWT anticipates development of this information in an iterative process. Mr. Michael Wochnick of the CIWMB has also expressed his Lincoln Avenue, Suite 1, Corona, CA (V) 951-736-1010 (F) 951-736-1919