ARCHIVED REPORTS_2006_13 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

It should be noted that in no event will any combination of the above-listed beneficial use materials and refuse exceed the maximum daily limit of 8,668 TPD. To establish the limits for the materials ADCshown above, Forward reviewed 2005 weight and volume records, which provided the maximum daily need for each material. Additionally, the 2005 total for each material was also divided by the permitted number of working days per year to establish the average daily need. Forward also conducted field tests at the landfill to determine refuse-to-cover ratios and in-place densities for those beneficial re-use materials utilized as ADC. the quantity ef material required te eeYeF refuse. Censistent with diseussiens with the LEA, the test fer green waste was eensidered te indieate alse the quantity ef ash er eement Win dust HeeessaF�,, and the test feF treated aute shredder residue was . Forward conducted the test for green waste several years ago and documented the results in a December 20, 2002 letter to Ms. Donna Heran, Director, San Joaquin County Environmental Health Division. Forward conducted the test for treated auto shredder residue in December 2005. This 'TD amendment .,eeup., nts the results f that testIn addition, the following procedures were used to provide control for those field tests conducted: 1) a specific ADC material is weighed and loaded into a dump truck; 2) a dozer then spreads the ADC material over the designated field test area (which is measured in square feet); 3) the ADC material is compacted to the minimum required thickness in accordance with 27 CCR or as approved by the LEA; and 4 using the recorded weight of the material, it is determined how much ADC material (in tons) was used to cover the measured test area (in square feet). The results from these tests were utilized to develop the refuse-to-cover ratio and density information presented in Appendix C-1. Sections 4.5 and 6.4.6 discusses the thickness of the various types of ADC reflected in the above maximum limits. To estimate the average need maximum 1; of contaminated soil shown above, Forward reviewed current(2005) waste inflow records to calculate a soiluq antity. assumed that eentaminated seil was required fer beth eever (daily and intermediate) these needs existed en he-saFne-daY was Ret ee,sid c—. To estimate the maximum limit for contaminated soils, shown above, Forward used the ratio of refuse to cover soil shown in Sections 4.5 and 6.4.7, and the invoiced quantities of operations layer constructed during 2004 and 2005 cell construction. Forward Landfill)TD 4-9 ):\Allied\ForwardUTD Amendment\March 2006)TD-LEA Resp\ITD\)TD Sec 4 Rev.doc 05/24/02;Amendment No.1: 5/22/2006