Laserfiche WebLink
3.1.2 QA/QC Results <br /> The QA/QC program completed for the second quarter 2012 water quality monitoring <br /> event at the Austin Unit included analyses of one field blank, two trip blanks, two <br /> laboratory method blanks, and one duplicate sample. The trip and field blanks were <br /> analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260 and method blanks were analyzed for all <br /> required analyses. The results of the QA/QC program indicate that acetone was detected <br /> at an estimated trace concentration in the field blank and one of the method blanks during <br /> the monitoring period; and with the exception of well AMW-4, acetone was not detected <br /> in any of the primary samples collected. A duplicate sample was collected from DMP <br /> well AMW-14 and labeled AMW-Duplicate. Duplicate groundwater results are <br /> presented along with the primary data in Table 3-1. The duplicate sample analyses <br /> yielded good correlation (less than 10%relative percent difference). Review of <br /> laboratory analysis dates with required holding times indicates that all samples were <br /> submitted and analyzed within the required holding times during the second quarter 2012. <br /> Based on the results of the laboratory blank and duplicate analyses, it is concluded that <br /> generally acceptable QA/QC procedures were exercised and the water quality samples <br /> collected from the Austin Unit appear to be representative of water quality at the site. <br /> 3.1.3 Groundwater Elevations and Contours <br /> Prior to purging and sampling, each well was sounded for water depth using a weighted <br /> electronic sounder, and the static water level was recorded on a well data sheet <br /> (Appendix Q. The groundwater elevations were calculated for each well by subtracting <br /> the depth-to-water measurement from the top-of-casing reference elevation. The current <br /> groundwater elevation data for the Austin Unit are summarized in Table 3-4. <br /> The groundwater elevation data obtained during this quarterly monitoring period were <br /> used to generate the groundwater elevation contour map shown on Figure 3-1, which <br /> indicates that groundwater beneath the Austin Unit generally flows to the north and <br /> northeast with a hydraulic gradient of approximately 0.001 ft/ft, although a northwest <br /> gradient of 0.004 was noted along the western half of the Austin Unit. <br /> To calculate the approximate linear groundwater flow velocity for the site, conservative <br /> assumptions were used, including a hydraulic conductivity of 875 gallons per day per <br /> square foot (0.04 cm/sec) and an estimated effective porosity of 35 percent(CH2M Hill <br /> 2000). An estimated groundwater flow velocity was calculated using Darcy's Law: <br /> c:\zoii-oozs\Fn_zQI2.aoo 8 Geo-Logic Associates <br />