ARCHIVED REPORTS_2014_8 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Consolidated Forward h.... Landfill Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND Assembly Bill 3180 became law in California in January 1, 1989. This bill requires all public agencies to adopt monitoring or reporting programs when they approve projects subject to Environmental impact Reports (EIRs) or Negative DedaraEons that identify significant impacts. The reporting or monitoring program must be adopted when a public agency makes its findings under the California Environmental Quality act (CEQA) so that the program can be made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate significant effects on the environment_ The program must be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects. This MMRP lists mitigation measures identified in this EIR, as well as three previous EIRs prepared for the project site. The three previous EIRs are: 1. County of San Joaquin, Community Development Department, Final Environmental Impact Report for the Forward, Inc. Landfill Use Perrrdt Modifications, County \o. ER - 92 -4, SCH No. 92032013, prepared by LSA Associates, Inc., March 2,1993 (identified as "Forward 1993" below). 2. City of Stockton, Public Works Department, Final Environmental Impact Report City of Stockton Austin Road Landfill Expansion Project, SCH No. 90020178, prepared by Environmental Science Associates, June 1994 (identified as "Austin 1994" below). 3. County of San Joaquin, Community Development Department, Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report: Austin Road Landfill Expansion Project, SCH No. 90020718, prepared by Grassetti Environmental Consulting, January 2000 (identified as "Austin 200(" below). This MAW includes both a complete listing of all required mitigation measures, and a table desen-ting who is responsible for monitoring the implementation of those meanrres, and how that monitoring shall be implemented. Mitigation measures are grouped by the impact categories used in this ED?, and numbered sequentially. Mitigation Measures from this EIR are printed in normal font, and identified as either "Measures Proposed as Part of the Project" or "Identified in This EIR", with the original Mitigation Measure numbers from this EIR following in (parentheses). Mitigation measures from the three previous EIRs are printed in italics and identified by their source (Forward 1993, Austin 1994, or Austin 2000, as defined above), followed by the Mitigation Measure number from the relevant EIR. Because some impacts in this EIR and previous EIRS do not require mitigation measures, the original mitigation measure numbers are not sequential. in some cases, mitigation measures from two or more of the previous EIRs that are substantially similar in content, or have been updated without otherwise being changed, have been combined. These mitigation measures are identified as "similar" and/or `'updated". ivii6gation measures from the three previous EIRs that have been replaced by equivalent measures in this EIR, or have already been implemented, are excluded from the list below. 11