ARCHIVED REPORTS_2014_8 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Consolidated Forward _ Landfill Page 16 51 (F.9) Identified in This EER: Replacement wel(5 (as well as additional wells north of the Austin Road Landfill to better define the leading edge of the plume) shall be installed to mitigate against the loss of old wells as presented in the JTD currently under review by the RWQCB. The RWQCB must approve the JTD's plans for the number and location of the new wells as part of their: approval process, which is separate from the EIR approval process. 52 Arestnn 1994 (K,3.c), Austin 2000 (K3.c) The tinting of the pumped discharge from the detention pond ntttst not occur with the peak flow rate ofLittle John's Creek as this would impact downstream locations by increasing the flood hazard. Telemetry, which monitors the flow in the creek to determine the peak, should be provided. This it fonnation should then be used to coordinate the start up of the pumps. 53 Austin 1994 (K5. e), Austin 2000 (K5. e) The landfill operator would include practices and procedures in the SIi�FP to comply with ,1B 1760. 77te procedures would describe how the expanded landfill would salvage all economicallyfeasible metallic discards. S4 Forward 1993 (C3) Diesel fuel should be stored in a manner which provides for secondary containment. Aft 55 (.2) Proposed as Part of the Project: Should additional cover material be needed, alternative daily covers, approved by the CTWMB, will be examined and used. 56 (G.3) Proposed as Part of the Project: The project sponsor has prepared a seismicity study for the site. If the potential maximum peak ground acceleration in the seismicity study is greater than that assumed in the preliminary design, the final project design analysis will make modifications needed to the factor of safety (determinations may be subject to the approval of the CIWMB and/or RWQCB). Impacts to the new liner and drainage system installed over the Austin Road Landfill will be monitored as appropriate based on any stipulations of the CTWi1IB and/or RWQCB. 57 (G.4) Proposed as Part of the Project: Overall reduction—or, in some cases, elimination or improvement—of slope instability at the project site can be achieved through the implementation of the seismic design measures designed to meet CCR Title 27. 58 (G.5) Proposed as Part of the Project: The applicant's Joint Technical Document references an erosion management plan that delineates various actions to minimize erosion and sedimentation, including appropriate construction, landscaping, and maintenance of graded slopes and subsurface drainage