My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2014_8
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2014_8
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2020 12:38:44 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:58:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2014_8
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2014_8.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
595
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
v <br />The LCRSs are tested annually to demonstrate operation in conformance with the WDRs. <br />The results of these tests are reported to the RWQCB and include comparison with earlier <br />tests made under comparable conditions. A leak detection system is also located under <br />the sumps (vadose zone) in the WMUs. The leak detection system consists of either <br />porous suction cup or pan lysimeters. The lysimeters are sampled and tested in <br />accordance with the site's WDRs. The chemistry of the LCRS fluids will be compared <br />with groundwater and subdrain liquid chemistry to evaluate whether a leak has occurred. <br />Recognizing that technical discussions with the CVRWQCB have indicated that a double <br />composite liner could be regarded as the most appropriate liner system for some landfill <br />locations, a cost comparison was developed for the Forward Landfill to identify the <br />additional costs that would likely be accrued for installation of a second composite liner. <br />As indicated below, based on current manufacturing, shipping, handling, installation and <br />CQA costs, it is estimated that inclusion of a second composite liner including clay, FML <br />and a leak detection layer would add as much as $10,000,000 to the long-term cost of the <br />prof ect. <br />Since the technical discussions presented above in Sections 1 through 6 strongly indicate <br />that the long-term performance of a single composite liner at the Forward Landfill is fully <br />protective of water quality in the vicinity of the site, the addition of a double composite <br />liner (with associated costs) would yield virtually no additional groundwater protection <br />benefit. <br />8.0 CONCLUSION <br />The studies that were performed for this project demonstrate that landfill leachate will not <br />impact groundwater at the Forward Landfill. This conclusion is supported by site <br />conditions that mitigate this possibility, and recent scientific research of lined landfills. <br />Specifically, recent research confirms that well-designed modern landfills do provide <br />adequate protection against water quality impairment (Giroud, Badu-Tweneboah & <br />Bonaparte, 1992; Bonaparte & Gross, 1990). In the 1990 study, Bonaparte & Gross <br />presented the results of a field study in which the authors investigated the quantity and <br />origins of flow in the leachate collection systems of 30 existing lined landfills. This <br />research confirmed that modern landfills result in negligible pollutant discharges to <br />ISgroundwater and the more recent research determined that even a prior study by Giroud <br />-18- <br />C:\2000-008\Forward Composite Liner V3 .doc\09119/02 <br />Geologic Associates <br />Unit Cost <br />Units Estimated Cost <br />FML <br />$0.601 <br />4,356,000 ft $2,610,000 <br />CCL <br />$10/ d <br />325,000 d $3,250,000 <br />Leak Detection Layer <br />$0.55/ <br />4,356,000 ft $2,396,000 <br />C A <br />$10,000/acre <br />100 acres $1,000,000 <br />Total Incremental Cost Est. <br />$9,250,000 <br />Since the technical discussions presented above in Sections 1 through 6 strongly indicate <br />that the long-term performance of a single composite liner at the Forward Landfill is fully <br />protective of water quality in the vicinity of the site, the addition of a double composite <br />liner (with associated costs) would yield virtually no additional groundwater protection <br />benefit. <br />8.0 CONCLUSION <br />The studies that were performed for this project demonstrate that landfill leachate will not <br />impact groundwater at the Forward Landfill. This conclusion is supported by site <br />conditions that mitigate this possibility, and recent scientific research of lined landfills. <br />Specifically, recent research confirms that well-designed modern landfills do provide <br />adequate protection against water quality impairment (Giroud, Badu-Tweneboah & <br />Bonaparte, 1992; Bonaparte & Gross, 1990). In the 1990 study, Bonaparte & Gross <br />presented the results of a field study in which the authors investigated the quantity and <br />origins of flow in the leachate collection systems of 30 existing lined landfills. This <br />research confirmed that modern landfills result in negligible pollutant discharges to <br />ISgroundwater and the more recent research determined that even a prior study by Giroud <br />-18- <br />C:\2000-008\Forward Composite Liner V3 .doc\09119/02 <br />Geologic Associates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.