Laserfiche WebLink
Table 9-1 <br /> (DHS Table P) <br /> COUNTY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR COMMERCIAL <br /> HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT FACILITIES PROJECTED TO THE YEAR 2000 <br /> (TONS) <br /> Projected Projected <br /> Projected Capacity Capacity <br /> County I Projected Excess (+) or Excess (+) or <br /> Capacity County 2 Deficiency3( Deficiency <br /> Generalized Requirement Capacity Scenario 1 Scenario 2 <br /> Treatment Method (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) <br /> Aqueous Treatment 1 ,887 -1 ,887 -1,887 <br /> Organic <br /> Aqueous Treatment 3,905 -3,905. -3,905 <br /> Metals/Neutralization <br /> Incineration 1 , 115 -1 , 115 -1, 115 <br /> Solvent Recovery 1 ,491 -1 ,491 -1 ,491 <br /> Oil Recovery 7,302 15,000 +7,6985 -7,302 <br /> Other Recycling 3,651 -3,651 -3,651 <br /> Stabilization 423 -423 -423 <br /> Bioreclamation _J_U —+Z.M -8 <br /> TOTAL 20,482 18,534 -1,948 -20,482 <br /> 1 . Data reflect projections to the year 2000. <br /> 2. No TSDFs currently operate in the County. <br /> 3. Scenario 1 (the action scenario) assumes that all of the proposed facilities <br /> are on-line by the year 2000 at maximum operating conditions. However, <br /> whether developers will succeed in securing all needed permits by this date <br /> is quettionable due to time constraints involved in permitting. This scenar- <br /> io assumes that such delays do not occur. For a discussion of the processes <br /> and maximum operating capacities of the two proposed facilities in the <br /> County, see Section 7.0. <br /> PJ9 9390502B.00D 9-3 Rev. 0 11/10/88 <br />