Laserfiche WebLink
AM. 5.1.2 Seismic Analysis <br />The Newmark Method of analysis (1965) was used to evaluate the stability of <br />slopes under seismic loading conditions. This method evaluates the slope stabil- <br />ity in terms of the permanent slope displacements that result from the seismic <br />loading. The procedure is based on the assumption that a slope will move and <br />permanently displace during the period of acceleration when the yield accelera- <br />tion is exceeded. The Newmark Method uses the ratio between the yield <br />acceleration and the average peak horizontal ground acceleration (Ky/Kp) to <br />determine the expected amount of permanent displacement. <br />The Newmark graph shown on Figure 5 was used for the seismic stability evalua- <br />tion. This graph was developed by Dr. Robert Pyke, Consulting Engineer, Berke- <br />ley, California, based on previous work by Franklin and Chang (1977) and Mak- <br />disi and Seed (1977). The chart shows the relationships between the accelera- <br />tion ratio and estimated displacements for Richter magnitude earthquakes (M) of <br />6.5 to 7.7 and 8 or greater. <br />0 5.2 CROSS SECTION GEOMETRY <br />E <br />The locations of the cross sections analyzed are shown on Figures 1 and 2 as - <br />Cross Sections Al -Al, A2 -A2, and A3 -A3. Cross Section Al -Al, as shown on <br />Figure 6, represents final grading of the landfill with maximum slopes of <br />12 percent. Cross Section A2 -A2, as shown on Figure 7, represents the maxi- <br />mum height of excavation of the proposed landfill. The maximum height of exca- <br />vation is 50 feet, and the average height is 30 feet at a 3:1 (horizontal to vertical) <br />slope. Cross Section A3 -A3, as shown on Figure 8, represents a typical refuse <br />moving face at a 3:1 (H:V) slope. The height of the refuse moving face was var- <br />ied during the analysis to determine the maximum height of the refuse moving <br />face. The engineering properties of the slope and foundation materials were dis- <br />cussed in Section 3.0. The ground -water surface was assumed to be at eleva- <br />tion -25 feet MSL, about 125 feet below the ground surface. <br />PJ9 9390217.00W 11 Rev. 0 May 23,1989 <br />