Laserfiche WebLink
5.4 SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSES <br />Slope stability analyses were performed on the proposed excavation slopes, <br />refuse moving face slopes, and final landfill slopes under both static and seismic <br />loading conditions with the assumption that a 1 -foot -thick clay liner will be used at <br />the site, using the STABL computer program (Purdue University). STABL em- <br />ploys the Modified Bishop's Method for circular failure surfaces, and the Janbu <br />Method for irregular failure surfaces. This section summarizes the analytical <br />methods, discusses the analyses conditions, and presents the analyses results. <br />Static stability analysis involves the calculation of a safety factor for assumed <br />failure surfaces through representative slope sections. The static safety factor is <br />defined as the ratio of the forces that act to preserve stability in a slope (resisting <br />forces) with the forces and moments acting to make the slope unstable (driving <br />forces). A safety factor less than about 1.1 (approaching unity) indicates a con- <br />dition of impending slope failure. A static safety factor of 1.5 is the generally ac- <br />cepted minimum value for long-term landfill slope stability. A static safety factor <br />of 1.3 to 1.5 is the generally accepted range of minimum values for short-term <br />slope stability. <br />Critical failure surfaces were automatically determined for selected cross sections <br />by the STABL program. The surfaces were randomly generated circular or irreg- <br />ular geometries, or irregular surfaces forced through weak zones (block sur- <br />faces). <br />Table 2 (see Appendix B) summarizes the results of the static stability analyses. <br />Critical failure surfaces under individual scenarios are shown on Figures 6,_7, and <br />8 (of Appendix B), respectively. In general, the static safety factors are 1.6 to 6.3 <br />and are greater than the minimum acceptable safety factor of 1.5. Because the <br />refuse strength parameters are generally weaker than the foundation soils, criti- <br />cal failure surfaces are in the refuse as shown on Figures 6 and 8 (see Ap- <br />pendix B). The Newmark Method of analysis (1965) was used to evaluate the <br />stability of slopes under seismic loading conditions. This method evaluates the <br />slope stability in terms of the permanent slope displacements that result from the <br />seismic loading. The procedure is based on the assumption that a slope will <br />PJ9 9390218A.00W 41 Rev. 0 July 20, 1989 <br />