Laserfiche WebLink
W. MICHAEL CARROLL, PE <br />COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />DECEMBER 22, 2009 <br />permitted height of the landfill is about 125 feet. The proposed raise is to 320 feet msl, or a height <br />of about 250 feet. Maximum stresses at the base of the proposed landfill are estimated to be about <br />20,000 psf at full height. <br />Section 9.2.1 of Appendix E notes that the maximum waste thickness will be about 255 feet, <br />corresponding to a maximum normal stress of about 20,000 psf. Section 9.2.1 also contains a <br />recommendation that the interface shear strength of the future liner systems for Modules 5 through 11 <br />should be tested to a maximum normal stress of 20,000 psf. The maximum thickness of waste in <br />Modules 1 and 3 are about 140 feet and 190 feet, respectively. <br />Bottom and Side Slone Liner <br />In line with previous landfill reviews over the last couple of years, DWR recommends that only <br />reinforced geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) be used as part of the bottom and side slope liners <br />underlying refuse. <br />We agree with DWR's recommendation for only using reinforced GCLs. Our standard practice is to <br />specify use of reinforced GCLs for liner system construction. Section 9.2.1 of Appendix E includes a <br />recommendation that a reinforced GCL consisting of a needle -punched GCL with non -woven geotextile <br />on both sides be used for the liner construction. <br />Waste Strength 0 <br />The strength assumed for the waste (friction angle — 33 degrees, cohesion — 100 psi) is slightly <br />outside the range that DWR has recommended in the past. This is unconservative. <br />It is true that the assumed waste shear strength (friction angle — 33 degrees, cohesion — 100 psf) is <br />slightly unconservative compared to the bilinear model recommended by Kavazanjian et al. (1995), <br />which we understand is favored by DWR. To be consistent with DWR recommendations, the failure <br />envelope described by Kavazanjian et al. (1995) as presented by Duncan and Wright (2005) (cohesion = <br />500 psf for normal stress < 770 psf; friction angle = 33 degrees, cohesion = 0 psf for normal stress > 770 <br />psf) has been used in the revised modeling. An updated Table l showing static factors of safety and <br />estimated seismic displacements is attached. <br />Liner Strength <br />The GCL/HDPE liner strengths vary for the different modules. Except for Module 4, the existing <br />modules seem to have a friction angle of 10 degrees and use smooth HDPE or single -side textured <br />[geomembrane]. Module 4 and the proposed modules seem to have a friction angle of 12 degrees <br />and use double -side textured HDPE (geomembrane]. <br />The critical liner interface strengths vary according to the liner system materials used or proposed in <br />each module. Because the liner system materials have varied in some modules, the critical interface <br />strengths also vary. The liner system components for each module were presented in Appendix E of the <br />2007 report. Those descriptions are reproduced here for ease of reference. <br />PAGE 2 <br />