Laserfiche WebLink
the cover liner system over the impermeable geomembrane. The GDN is the drainage <br /> layer, which is designed to allow water to rapidly migrate out of the cover section and <br /> thereby reduce the presence of pore water and its detrimental effects. According to <br /> Othman et al. (1995), if an effective drainage layer is incorporated into the cover system, <br /> the effects of water flow above the geomembrane can be considered negligible, and a <br /> stability analysis only considering the drained condition of the slope is adequate. <br /> 3.3 Seismic Screening Analysis <br /> ' 3.3.1 Seismic Hazard Evaluation <br /> As noted previously, Shaw performed a site-specific seismic hazard evaluation <br /> (Attachment 1). This report provides the magnitude of the MPEs and their corresponding <br /> PGA values for faults that may impact this site. The following MPE event is more <br /> critical than others for this site: <br /> ' 1. An MPE of moment magnitude 6.9 along the Coast Range Central Valley fault, <br /> segment 7 (GV7) located at a distance of 1.2 kilometers producing a peak ground <br /> acceleration(PGA) in rock of 0.56g at the site. <br /> The MPE on the GV7 fault is expected to influence the landfill stability more than any of <br /> the other faults noted in the seismic characterization report. Therefore, a PGA in rock <br /> equal to 0.56g has been used for the seismic slope stability analysis. As noted in the <br /> seismic characterization report, the PGA used for this stability analysis is assumed to be <br /> very conservative. The conservative nature of the PGA is a result of its development <br /> using what the USGS has defined as the maximum magnitude event from the <br /> seismogenic source. <br /> 3.3.2 Seismic Screening Analysis <br /> The same area analyzed for the static condition was also analyzed in the seismic <br /> ' screening analysis. Seismic screening, or pseudo-static, analyses apply a constant <br /> horizontal acceleration of 0.75 x PGA (Bray et al., 1998)which represents a conservative <br /> approach for simplified seismic slope stability. The acceleration for these analyses is <br /> 0.75 x 0.56g = 0.42g. Per Title 27 CCR, if the pseudo-static factor of safety is less than <br /> 1.5, rigorous analyses must be performed to estimate the potential for permanent <br /> ' displacement. <br /> The results of the seismic screening analysis is presented in Calculation 2. <br /> 3.3.3 Yield Acceleration <br /> The yield acceleration is the average horizontal acceleration value within the critical <br /> failure surface that results in a pseudo-static factor of safety of 1. Based on Newmark <br /> (1965), if the maximum value of the averaged accelerations induced within the critical <br /> slopes (often referred to as the seismic coefficient or kora,) exceeds the yield acceleration <br /> value, the potential exists for permanent displacement along the critical failure surface. <br /> The yield acceleration for the area analyzed does not exceed the estimated PGA for the <br /> Landfill. This indicates that permanent seismic displacement during a MW = 6.9 event <br /> Slope Stability Analysis Corral Hollow Landfill—Rev 2 512012012 <br /> 5 <br />