Laserfiche WebLink
In January 2008, Water Board staff approved the conceptual design for the method of closure of <br /> refuse outside the existing closure cap. This design included GCL overlain by two feet of soil. <br /> In December 2008, five new LFG extraction wells were installed,two more than originally <br /> proposed. The additional wells were located to control LFG impact to groundwater near MW-5. <br /> The concentration of methane from the wells remains below 2%, indicating that little LFG is <br /> produced in these areas. Continuing to collect low-methane gas from these wells reduces the <br /> methane content of the LFG reaching the flare station, inhibiting the ability of the flare to maintain <br /> proper temperature. However, collection from these wells continues in an effort to collect LFG <br /> that may be carrying VOCs to the groundwater. <br /> On February 22, 2011, in a meeting at RWQCB offices, Caltrans staff indicated willingness to <br /> participate with the closure of the landfill. Issuing a Section 13267 Order by Water Board was <br /> discussed. <br /> On July 7, 2011, the County and Caltrans both received a Section 13267 Order to extend the <br /> closure cap over uncapped refuse. Task 1 of the order required that the Final Cover Expansion <br /> Design be submitted by October 10, 2011. This was the first instance in which Caltrans was <br /> directly named in an enforcement action by Water Board staff. The order also required the County <br /> to evaluate the extent of the groundwater release and to design corrective actions with the <br /> installation of three permanent groundwater monitoring wells. <br /> On August 30, 2011, the County and Caltrans signed a Memorandum of Understanding agreeing <br /> to allow the County access to Caltrans property to install groundwater monitoring wells required <br /> in the Order, and that the closure cap would be installed over both properties in a single project. <br /> On October 6, 2011,the County submitted the Final Cover Expansion Design, executing the <br /> design approved in January 2008 that provided two feet of soil over the GCL. A letter from <br /> RWQCB staff dated November 1, 2011 stated that Compliance and Enforcement staff concurred <br /> Ithat the plan satisfied the requirements of Task 1 of the Order. <br /> On October 10, 2011, the County drilled three wells in Caltrans property to assess the extent <br /> release of the plume as required by RWQCB order. VOC's related to LFG were discovered at <br /> each well. The extent of release could not be reliably assessed with these wells. To document this <br /> work, a"Well Completion Report"was submitted December 14, 2011, and an EMP report was <br /> submitted January 31, 2012. <br /> In February 2012 a second set of three wells (MW-9A, -10A, and-1 IA) were installed and <br /> sampled, again in Caltrans property. The results from these analyses allowed a better estimate of <br /> the extent of release. County staff submitted a second Well Completion Report on May 7, 2012. <br /> On March 15, 2012,the County and Caltrans received a Notice of Violation due to failure to <br /> submit a cover design that meets the performance standard of Title 27 for failure to submit an <br /> acceptable closure design,thereby rescinding the approval granted in 2008. <br /> On April 23, 2012,the County submitted a revised and preliminary Final Cover Expansion <br /> Design, incorporating a low-density polyethylene membrane. This letter included a preliminary <br /> schedule showing completion in December 2012. <br /> Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill 7 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 2nd Quarter 2014 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—July 15,2014 <br />