Laserfiche WebLink
4.3 GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS <br /> Prior to purging and sampling, each well was sounded for water depth using weighted <br /> p g a g <br /> electronic sounder, and the static water level was recorded on a Well Data Sheet <br /> (Appendix C). The groundwater elevations were calculated for each well by subtracting <br /> the depth-to-water measurement from the top-of-casing reference elevation. The current <br /> groundwater elevation data for the French Camp Landfill are summarized in Table 5. <br /> The groundwater elevation data obtained duringthis quarterly rly momtortng period were <br /> used to generate the groundwater elevation contour map shown on Figure 1, which <br /> indicates that groundwater flows to the south with an average hydraulic gradient of <br /> approximately 0.002 ft/ft. <br /> To calculate the approximate linear groundwater flow velocity for the site, conservative <br /> assumptions were used, including a hydraulic conductivity of 300 gallons per day per <br /> square foot(0.014 cm/sec), and an estimated effective porosity of 35 percent(CH2M Hill <br /> 2000). An estimated range in groundwater flow velocity was calculated using Darcy's <br /> Law: <br /> Ki em 0.002 sec– ft <br /> V = — = [(0.014 —)* ]*2835 0.227 ft /day <br /> ne sec 0.35 cm – day <br /> where: V=Groundwater flow velocity. <br /> K–Hydraulic conductivity of the water-bearing unit(0.014 cm/sec). <br /> i=Hydraulic gradient: i;:�5 0.002 for the site during the current(fourth quarter 2007) <br /> monitoring period. <br /> ne=Effective porosity(ne=0.35);an estimated value. <br /> The groundwater flow rate is calculated to be 0.227 feet/day(83 feet/year). <br /> 4.4 DETECTION MONITORING PROGRAM <br /> Fourth quarter 2007 field and laboratory results for DMP monitoring wells (MW-6A, <br /> MW-7A, MW-8A, MW-9A, MW-913, and MW-lOA) are summarized in Table 2 and <br /> time-series plots are presented in Appendix D. As shown in the time-series plots, the <br /> general chemistry and metals constituents are generally consistent with historical <br /> concentrations. Organic results indicate that a trace concentration of 1,2-dichloroethane <br /> (1,2-DCA) was measured in the sample collected from well MW-913 and a trace <br /> concentration of trichlorofluoromethane(TCFM) was measured in the sample collected <br /> from well MW-9A. <br /> Concentration Limits <br /> For DMP monitoring wells at the French Camp Landfill, concentration limits (CLs) are <br /> used for the water quality protection standards (WQPS). The CLs shown in Table 2 were <br /> calculated by Herst& Associates using Sanitas®, a state-approved statistical software <br /> program, using historical data from background wells MW-6A and MW-7A, and are <br /> D:\2003_021\FC_4Q07.doc <br /> 3 Geologic Associates <br />