My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2011
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEBER
>
2435
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440010
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:42 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:13:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2011
RECORD_ID
PR0440010
PE
4445
FACILITY_ID
FA0001552
FACILITY_NAME
EAST STKN RECYCLE/TRANSFER STATION
STREET_NUMBER
2435
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WEBER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15323117
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2435 E WEBER AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4445_PR0440010_2435 E WEBER_2011.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6�L�/tVF"EL®ER <br /> Bright People.Right Solutions. <br /> emissions to emission rates for dispersion modeling. Diesel particulate matter only has <br /> long-term risk exposures; thus, only the annual emissions were calculated and used for <br /> modeling. <br /> Truck trip estimates were based on information provided by the project applicant. <br /> Emission rates were determined from the EMFAC2007 emission model for various <br /> future years, with regulatory requirements applied (e.g., 2010 RRP reductions and <br /> newer trucks by 2023). An average emission rate was then determined based on a 70- <br /> year period (i.e., the exposure time of a residential receptor). The emission rates <br /> included running emissions both on and off the project site, and idling emissions. <br /> Emissions of diesel PM from trucks were assessed using the EPA AERMOD (v. 11103) <br /> model, using the BREEZE software (v 7.3.0). <br /> 1 Sensitive receptors were chosen based on where workers or residents would be located <br /> for long term exposure scenarios using a combination of aerial photographs and site <br /> reconnaissance. The primary sensitive receptors were the residences located across <br /> Weber Avenue from the facility. Worker receptors were depicted as discrete receptors <br /> located at areas where businesses were identified or where workers activities could <br /> occur on a routine basis. This includes industrial offices, grocery stores, convenience <br /> stores, retail outlets, businesses, etc. No discrete receptors (i.e., hospitals, schools, <br /> churches, parks and daycare centers) were identified in the area of concern. <br /> Risk characterization refers to the process of quantifying the risk associated with a <br /> given exposure to a toxic air pollutant. The focus of the health risk analysis for the <br /> project was the inhalation pathway as the primary exposure route for diesel particulate <br /> matter. The CARB approved risk assessment health values that include cancer and <br /> chronic factors of 3.0E-04 and 5.0E+00, respectively. To determine the risk results, <br /> these factors were multiplied by the associated concentration value provided by the <br /> model. For residents, the exposure is assessed based on 24 hours per day, 7 days per <br /> week for 70 years. For workers, the exposure is based on 50 years, 8 hours per day, 5 <br /> days per week. Thus, the risk to the workers is 16% of the risk to the residents. For <br /> this project, the significance thresholds for health risk associated with diesel particulate <br /> emissions were 10 cases of cancer per 1,000,000 and a Health Hazard index of 1.0 for <br /> chronic conditions, per GAMAQI. <br /> Table 3-2 shows the results of the health risk analysis for the project. As shown in <br /> Table 3-2, the health risk associated with elevated diesel particulate emissions at the <br /> project site would be below the significance thresholds. Therefore, the project would <br /> have no significant impact related to diesel particulate emissions on nearby residents or <br /> on workers at the project site. Refer to Appendix A for more detailed information on <br /> health risk analysis methodology and results. <br /> 121339/ST011 R226 3-22 October 14, 2011 <br /> Copyright 2011 Kleinfelder <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.