Laserfiche WebLink
xCENTRAL L 1 ALAT T LBOARD <br /> Ist�cTTcx <br /> .....................I--....I.......j <br /> 18 May 1990 <br /> DISCHARGER: San Joaquin CountyRECEIVEV <br /> LOCATION & COUNTY: Lovelace Rd. San Joaquin County M AY 2 1 , :Pn <br /> CONTACT(S): Felipe Lomas C.NVIRONMENTAL HE LTF <br /> PER IT/SERVIC"E <br /> INSPECTION DATE: 8 May 1990 <br /> INSPECTED BY: Bill Marshall and Steve Rosenbaum <br /> ACCOMPANIED Y: unaccompanied <br /> OBSERVATIONS AND COMMENTS: <br /> This inspection was made in response to an inspection of the transfer station by Leandro <br /> Ramos of the California Integrated Waste Management Board. Mr. Ramos informed the Regional <br /> Board that rainfall , which had contacted waste materials in the transfer station, was <br /> discharged to a pond for disposal . We inspected the site and the pond to determine if it <br /> was in compliance with Title 23 of the California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3, <br /> Subchapter 15. <br /> The pond was on the north side of the transfer station and it appeared that rainfall <br /> entering the transfer station was discharged to the pond. The pond was apparently unlined. <br /> No liquid was contained in the pond at the time of inspection. The pond bottom appeared <br /> to consist of silty sand which would allow quick percolation of liquids. <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> We recommend that the pond be checked during the rainy season to determine if the liquids <br /> discharged to the ponds are a 'designated' waste. If the liquids are a designated waste, <br /> then the pond may need to be retrofitted to comply with Subchapter 15. Recommend that San <br /> Joaquin County be required to analyze the liquids in the pond and determine if these liquid <br /> wastes are 'designated' waste. Characterization of pond liquids should be done after rains <br /> flush liquid wastes into the pond. <br /> Wii am,.J'. Marshall , Chi e <br /> Waste Discharge to Land Unit <br /> 1 <br />