Laserfiche WebLink
Intersection Safety <br /> There is no evidence to suggest that implementation of the project would directly or indirectly increase <br /> the existing accident rate at the intersection of MacArthur Drive and Urine Road. Therefore, there is no <br /> impact. <br /> Public Transit Service <br /> The implementation of the project would not directly or indirectly affect existing or planned public transit <br /> service. Therefore, there is no impact <br /> Bicycles and Pedestrians <br /> The implementation of the project would not directly or indirectly affect existing or planned bicycle or <br /> pedestrian facirities. Therefore,there is no impact. <br /> Mitigation <br /> Roadways <br /> No mitigation required. <br /> Intersection 92grations <br /> No mitigation required. <br /> Intersection Safety <br /> No mitigation required. <br /> Public Transit Service <br /> No impact identified. <br /> Bicycles and Pedestrians <br /> No impact identified. <br /> Attest es <br /> San Joaquin County officials developed the following project alternatives: <br /> • Two alternative sites MW could accommodate the proposed project-, <br /> • An alternative route to the Foothill Landfill exiting State Route 99 at State Route 26, instead of <br /> State Route 4, and traveling east to Escalon Bellota Road, east on Shelton Road and south on <br /> Waverly Road; <br /> • An alternative waste c6sposal site at the North County Landfill, trucks would follow the proposed <br /> route along State Route 99 exiting at Harney Lane and continuing to the landfill; and <br /> • A route to provide service to Mountain House. <br /> The alternative site analysis is contained in Chapter 6. <br /> ER-93-11 .54- (9-27-93) <br />